MRX2099
Well-known member
Ok I traded the Line 6 Variax acoustic yesterday in at the Orlando SAM ASH to this NEW Ibanez RGR320EXRBX reverse headstock,
http://www.wikizic.org/Ibanez-RGR320/gallery-1.htm
all flat black, EDGE III Tremelo, It has the "Designed by EMG" pups in it, it sounds great so far, they are passive not active pups, (BTW its tuned to DROP "B" , just like Slipknot) I was gonna get the Ibanze Slipknot AXE the MTM2 but I wanted a tremelo guitar not the fixed bridge, its almost the same thing
But back to my question Like I said its sounds good thru my MB Recto Pre and 2:100 going thru my 1960A cab with (4) GT12T 75watters in stereo I was wondering how much better or would it be a big huge difference if I got the EMG active 81 & 85 set, I have huge strings on it now since its dropped so low its got 10-52's now, I might later tune to DROP "C" instead, will the Active set be that much better, has anyone compared the 2 sets side by side the "Designed by EMG" set that are passive with the actual EMG 81-85 set :?: :?:
TKS
Jeff
http://www.wikizic.org/Ibanez-RGR320/gallery-1.htm
all flat black, EDGE III Tremelo, It has the "Designed by EMG" pups in it, it sounds great so far, they are passive not active pups, (BTW its tuned to DROP "B" , just like Slipknot) I was gonna get the Ibanze Slipknot AXE the MTM2 but I wanted a tremelo guitar not the fixed bridge, its almost the same thing
But back to my question Like I said its sounds good thru my MB Recto Pre and 2:100 going thru my 1960A cab with (4) GT12T 75watters in stereo I was wondering how much better or would it be a big huge difference if I got the EMG active 81 & 85 set, I have huge strings on it now since its dropped so low its got 10-52's now, I might later tune to DROP "C" instead, will the Active set be that much better, has anyone compared the 2 sets side by side the "Designed by EMG" set that are passive with the actual EMG 81-85 set :?: :?:
TKS
Jeff