visualrocker69
Well-known member
Still fairly new to Mesa products, but I’m starting to get the picture. Kinda. There’s really a lot of subjectivity involved.
Now I’d like to get two distinct perspectives sorted out.
It seems there’s quite a bit of hype about the Mark IIC+ …and after hearing clips of it, I can see why. It’s very much justified, and all. I think Elpelotero sums up the “status quo” opinion:
I guess I got caught up in the cult-ish following the amp has, but then scrolled to other threads and read a very interesting and *completely* different perspective, presented by none other than Boogiebabies:
You can find the entire quote here: http://forum.grailtone.com/viewtopic.php?p=77074&highlight=#77074
I highly encourage anyone unsure of their opinion to do so, it’s highly enlightening.
Anyway, how do the rest of you feel? Is the IIC+ truly the final answer? The only amp a guitarist could ever want? Is it worth putting everything else on low priority just to pursue it?
Or are each of the amps truly unique in that they are not better or worse persay? Would it be more practical for someone such as myself to buy a Mark IV first to lay a foundation and then worry about novelties like the IIC+?
The rational part of me agrees with the latter, but the idealist in me will settle for nothing other than the IIC+. Of course, a huge part of it is fixation and idolization. But it IS the Mark IIC+ we’re talking about… it’s justified, like I said before.
In other words, after this summer (taking out the cost of a new guitar and cab) I’ll have enough money to buy a IIC+ should one come up. Should I just obsessively pursue it or should I instead relax, settle for a IV (which, everyone seems to agree, is an oustanding amp on its own) and worry about the IIC+ later?
…it just frightens me that I might do just that, and then miss an opportunity to get a IIC+. I’d kick myself forever if that happened. (Well, at least until another one came along )
Gah! I just don’t know. HELP.
Thanks
Now I’d like to get two distinct perspectives sorted out.
It seems there’s quite a bit of hype about the Mark IIC+ …and after hearing clips of it, I can see why. It’s very much justified, and all. I think Elpelotero sums up the “status quo” opinion:
Elpelotero said:I don't think anyone ever needs another amp besides the Mark2C+.
[...] the C+ makes you forget about every other amp in existence when you play it.
Elpelotero said:once you hear the cleans on a Mark2C+, you will utterly forget that Fender and Roland even exist as companies. I used to think the same thing. My friends fender twin is very very nice, but the C+ steps up to the plate like you wouldn't believe.
I guess I got caught up in the cult-ish following the amp has, but then scrolled to other threads and read a very interesting and *completely* different perspective, presented by none other than Boogiebabies:
Boogiebabies said:The IIC+ is in a class by itself. No offense, but no self respecting IIC+ owner would disagree. Especially those who have been chasing the dragon for 22 years. One persons "Close" is anothers unnacceptable. The evolution of the C+ to the III and IVA and B are variations on a theme. They sound different from each other and the next amp off the line regardelss. They are not the IIC+.
[…]The MK IV is the most refined Boogie ever. It should have it's own posistion in amplifier history instead of being compared to the IIC+.
[…]The point? They all sound different for many reasons. You would be hard pressed to find two Boogie that sound identical off the production line yet alone two that are 15-22 years apart.
You can find the entire quote here: http://forum.grailtone.com/viewtopic.php?p=77074&highlight=#77074
I highly encourage anyone unsure of their opinion to do so, it’s highly enlightening.
Anyway, how do the rest of you feel? Is the IIC+ truly the final answer? The only amp a guitarist could ever want? Is it worth putting everything else on low priority just to pursue it?
Or are each of the amps truly unique in that they are not better or worse persay? Would it be more practical for someone such as myself to buy a Mark IV first to lay a foundation and then worry about novelties like the IIC+?
The rational part of me agrees with the latter, but the idealist in me will settle for nothing other than the IIC+. Of course, a huge part of it is fixation and idolization. But it IS the Mark IIC+ we’re talking about… it’s justified, like I said before.
In other words, after this summer (taking out the cost of a new guitar and cab) I’ll have enough money to buy a IIC+ should one come up. Should I just obsessively pursue it or should I instead relax, settle for a IV (which, everyone seems to agree, is an oustanding amp on its own) and worry about the IIC+ later?
…it just frightens me that I might do just that, and then miss an opportunity to get a IIC+. I’d kick myself forever if that happened. (Well, at least until another one came along )
Gah! I just don’t know. HELP.
Thanks