siggy14,
With each successive post, you are becoming more and more irrational, illogical, emotionally-driven and personal.
RE: "You bash amps...". Name an example of where I've bashed even a single amp in this thread so far. You can't do it. It doesn't exist, since all I have done is point out why and how a Mesa Rectifier has similar characteristics regarding low-mids to the original poster's problem. Being honest about this particular amp's legitimate shortcomings while also claiming it is still my favorite amp is a far cry from "bashing" anything.
RE: "...you think you know everything about amps...". I have claimed no greater expertise in my knowledge of amplifiers than you yourself have done, and yet I would not say you claim to know everything about amps. Hmm. The only relevant point here is that what I do know, I am willing to share freely, even if my lack of sycophantic devotion to all things Mesa happens to rub you the wrong way. Oh well.
RE: "Most of your information is mis-informed and you type alot of BS to try to prove your point.". Name one example. Just one. Oh, and provide evidence that it is objectively incorrect. If not, your claim here is nothing more than personal vindictiveness.
RE: "This is what I have to say to anyone reading this thread, do not take my advice, do not take Chris's advice, take a look at all the countless recordings with recto's, the number of users.". I would say take both of our advice, and anyone else's you find useful, then ultimately go find out for yourself what you like and what works for your needs.
RE: "Do you think all these people will still use these amps if you had to do studio magic in order to make them sound good?". Yeah, well...by that same logic, you could look at all the hordes of Marshall users and ask, "do you think all these people use Marshall amps if there were really a need for another amp like a Mesa Recto?". Argument by popularity contest. It doesn't hold water. People would still be best served by obtaining as much objective (not blindly biased) information and testing things out for themselves, then making a decision based on what they like, individually.
You have been called, repeatedly, on your false statements, and you have responded, repeatedly, by levelling further irrelevant and ad hominem criticisms. If you can't support an argument with legitimate and objective information, then I suppose making personal attacks is at least a consolation. Too bad.
