wads3 said:v-1 svetlana
v-2 svetlana
v-3 tung sol
v-4 tung sol
v-5 electro harmonix
sed winged =c= el 34's and 6l6's
What a difference from the JJ's. It sounds like a monster now!
:twisted:
:twisted:
:twisted:
wads3 said:v-1 svetlana
v-2 svetlana
v-3 tung sol
v-4 tung sol
v-5 electro harmonix
sed winged =c= el 34's and 6l6's
What a difference from the JJ's. It sounds like a monster now!
:twisted:
:twisted:
:twisted:
That changes the more threads you respond too.wads3 said:How do you get the text under your name???? ie Mark IV
No not at all my amp is even more quiet, than it ever was.wads3 said:I tried the tung sol in v-1 and it made my lead channel very noisy...
highroller said:I'm a big fan of the JJ stuff but after reading so many good comments about Tung-Sol and SED, I decided to order a set to give it a try. I will do some test this weekend to see if the JJ are still the best option !
After trying more tube combinations, I finally reverted my setup to 4 JJ 6L6, my Mark IV definitively need darker tubes with the JB pickup. It is interesting to see that different tubes can greatly affect the overall sound of an amp.Made some test today with different combinations of tubes in my Mark IV "A" (Seymour duncan JB/Jazz pickups) I found the Tung-Sol to be more harmonically rich than the JJ s. However, the SED 6L6 are way too bright for my taste, seem very similar to Svetlana 6L6 in term of brightness. I ended up with Tung-Sol in the preamp and combination of JJ 6L6 with SED Winged C EL-34 in the power section. The darker tone of the JJ mix very well with the brightness of the SED !!!
Enter your email address to join: