Rocky said:That is unless the person talking is an Ed Roman type in which case they should be ignored.
dmt said:Rocky said:That is unless the person talking is an Ed Roman type in which case they should be ignored.
-1 for Ed Roman... that guy is a douche...
dmt said:When are you ever gonna need to swap the neck on a guitar? repairs? what do you happen to play hit the gopher with your guitar on stage? toss your guitar around? maybe set it on fire?
carlsoti said:Hows about leaping off a drum riser, pulling off a perfect townsend-esque windmill in mid-air to finish a song, landing on a pedal, twisting your ankle, and going down on a floor monitor, snapping the neck at the 15th fret.
stadidas said:Of all the people that have said a bolt-on is better because it's easier to replace, seriously, how often do you snap the neck on a guitar?
Even if the sound is the same or better with a bolt on (which I doubt), I've never played a bolt-on with decent access to the 24th fret. And I use that fret a lot more often than I snap necks.
Once was enough to sway my opinion. That doesn't mean that I WON'T play a set neck guitar. It's just that, for what I'm willing to spend on a guitar, the bolts usually fare better.stadidas said:how often do you snap the neck on a guitar?