waxnsteel said:
You're one of the first to speak respectfully. Thanks for that.
But you're way off base to talk about all the variables there supposedly are with the clips I've posted. When each clip was reamped (same performance), the amp didn't move, the mic didn't move, no other knob than the one that selects tube complement changed, other than maybe 30 seconds, I can't see any variables in my instance. I've also posted those clips here and on a few other boards with a poll attached to see if people could tell the difference, and the results look like most are guessing. So in this amp, I'd have to disagree with you. Another amp maybe, I haven't doen a whole lot of power tube type changes in other amps.
Never owned a regular DR or TR, so I have no idea what the difference is. The only thing I really get worked up about is when folks say that putting 6L6s in an amp makes it sound more Fender, or EL34s more Marshall. In a Mesa, it'll still sound just like a mesa. Speaker changes are what I'd call night & day differences, whereas tube changes tend to be very subtle.
The majority of my experiences come from power tube swapping amps - Road King, Blue Angel, and a Budda Dual Stage 30. Of those, IMO, the most dramatic change (though it is still subtle) is with the Blue Angel. It breaks up lower on the dial with 6V6s than EL84s or both(even when properly switching the speaker jack to the proper impedance) a slight mid shift, and a little less top when compared to the other two settings. The Budda and the Road King, I find to be nearly indistinguishable, even when pushed very hard.
As a guy who has experimented with a hoard of NOS tubes, you yourself must know that in a given circuit, you can sometimes find as much difference between two pairs of 6L6s as between a pair of 6L6s and EL34s.
What I'd love to hear would be CLIPS of all of these dramatic changes. It's not hard to not move knobs so we can hear the difference the tubes actually make from tube to tube. If you turn the knobs, of course it'll sound different. If it didn't, you'd take it back, right?
A microphone isn't going to capture the exact sound of the amplifier as the human ear captures it. The microphone can't think and tune into a certain frequency. In the studio, the most one can do is capture a good representation of the amplifier and move on.
As far as the variables in the studio....
The types of mics you used
The types of cables you used
How long were the cables?
What were the cables made of?
The type of mic preamp you used
The recording setup you used
Did you record on tape and convert to digital?
Is your recording setup all digital?
Did you mic the room?
How many mics did you use?
Settings?... (you said you maxed the gain)
Guitar?
Guitar Cables?
Speaker Cables?
What exact type of tubes?
You said you re-amped the clip (supposedly a split dry signal from the original recording)
Did you EQ the signal after recording it?
The list could go on and on and on. It's a Calculus problem at best. I'm nowhere near being way off base. It doesn't matter if you didn't change a thing.
All I'm saying is that it's going to be very tough to capture a subtle change with a sound clip.
I agree to a certain point about the differences when swapping power tube types. In some amplifiers, it isn't as overwhelming as others. It all comes down to the circuit itself. While doing this in all of the Rectos I've owned, there is a difference. In the Diezels I've owned, there is a difference. In the Bogners I've owned, there was a difference within the same power tube type and preamp tube type. There is a difference between a JCM 800 with EL34's and one with KT88's or 6550's. There is a difference in a Naylor Superdrive 60 when swapping from a 6L6GC to the Sovtek 5881 (if you want to call it a 5881).
Anyway, that's my "buck 'o' five".
Take Care,
Dale