Simul class vs non simul class Mark CII+

[shark diver]

What are the tone differences between these?

 

[shark diver]

Thank you have a CII+ on the way with the 105 but no simul. I was thinking about seeing about having Mesa mod it to simul, if they even do that, but on the fence about it.

 

[dodger916]

I'd suggest living with it for a while before changing it.

 

[shark diver]

That is how I am leaning.

I plan on running this in a switching system with a SLOr. My thought was clean channel on SLO for Classic tones, OD channel on the SLO for leads. Clean on CII+ for cleans, and the OD on the CII+ for heavier rhythms.

So the review below means I will have to decide which is more important to me cleans or rhythms:

So here's how I think about usage... if I want to get into some Metallica or very rhythm centric guitar work I will unquestionably go with the 60/100 (shocking I know).. if I am into a more classic rock or lead state of mind I will go for the Simul. I choose the Simul for clean tones hands down as well.

Obviously need to play it first though.

 

[igfraso]

Mike B. told me to run it on 100 Watt and plug the 8 ohm speaker into the 4 ohm jack.
This is the way to mimic a Simul-Class sound on a 60/100 watter.

 

[lesterpaul]

Mike B. told me to run it on 100 Watt and plug the 8 ohm speaker into the 4 ohm jack.
This is the way to mimic a Simul-Class sound on a 60/100 watter.

+1...Mike convinced me to do it with my Coli C+...and I was going to send it in along with $$$..Mike is the sh#t 8)
...live with her a while..good advice in amps AND womenz!!