desertdweller said:
How about the Triaxis, 2:90, G Force, and your power strip. That's what I use and it's all I need. If you think it's congested now, what the hell is going to happen when you load it with all that unnecessary nonsense? Also, when playing live, who's moving that 1000 space rack up onto the stage or out of the band's trailer?
Right on. Um...yeah...that unnecessary nonsense makes a ton of sense when I need more than just one sound for clients that desire more than a classic boogie tone. I learned real quick that, even though my big rig looks awesome on stage, it is a pain in the *** to haul and set up with only 2 roadies. When the day comes to do arena tours with a team 4 directly assigned to set up my rig, then I'll think about bringing this rack along. For general club and small venue (5k or less capacity), I'm a big believer that less is more regarding live tones because everything get's mic'ed anyway.
For live stuff I found that my Mark V + my effects/wireless rack + 1 iso cab is sufficient. Its small, sounds fantastic, and it's pretty hard to f**k up when all you have to do is roll it on stage, take the doors off, hook up the cab, plug it in, turn it on, and Boogie. It has nice castors so it's really easy to haul. That one is a cakewalk and it's clean (relatively speaking). Set-up and tear down is less than 60 seconds. It's was great when were on those "come watch 18 bands in 4 hours" type gigs.
I also have another rig that is purely Power Conditioner, Wireless, Triaxis, Tuner, 2:Ninety into 2x12 cab. That's great for practice and for those gigs where the stage is as big as a card table or for home party gigs.
ando said:
Ever heard of short patch cables?!!
Ever heard of a ritual killing?!!
desertdweller said:
I've played in a lot of bands, and it seems the best guitarists seem to have simpler rack systems or amps and let their playing shine through. Most guys that have refrigerators full of rack gear generally have tone that sounds like open ***.
I've been playing semi-professionally for the past 10 years and I agree with you for the most part...except everything sounds awesome when it comes to my rack (NO HUM, NO CRACKLE, VERY DEFINITIVE AND ARTICULATE TONE). I was planning on playing in a Cover Band that covered anything from GnR, Kylesa, Alice in Chains, Dream Theater, etc. My signal path for any one configuration was basically:
Guitar>GCX (on/off NS2, TS808, CHORUS, WAH)>TRIAXIS (EQ in FX loop on/off)>2:Ninety (all modes switched via GCX)>Cabs
desertdweller said:
I saw this guy about 6 months ago open for our band...20 space rack...he had his dual rectifier running through so many EQs and effects (including a Lexicon MPXG2 and a line 6 something or other) it sounded dull and nasal. No mids, no body, no definition. When his band played, you couldn't hear him because he got lost in the mix.
Yeah...Dual Rectifier with EQs and effects in the loop. That's not going to be a surprise to anyone who has spent considerable time with those amps. It took me 6 months to find the "proper Recto tone." I have posted about this topic exhaustively in the Recto forums. Personally, think those amps sound like **** no matter how you cut it unless you EQ it properly...and even then it's only bearable to listen to. They sound great for studio recordings if you know what you're doing, but that's about it. As soon as I took it out to do gigs for my A Brutal Confession project, I knew that Rectos weren't for me. Sounded too generic for my taste. I never was lost in the mix but I felt the generic tone did the music a bit of an injustice...but that's just my 2 cents on that topic.
desertdweller said:
Why are you building such an insane rack?
Because I can. Someone has to help keep non-generic Rock 'n Roll alive in Minneapolis.