Marcus71
Well-known member
Last week I posted about my Mark III that I just purchased. It was one of the early units and has a serial number of 16,xxx. There is no black dot or black stripe on it. Just Mike B's initials.
Prior to buying this amp I contacted a guy who had a Mark III green stripe for sale on Craigslist. However, he told me someone was buying his Mark. He emailed me on Saturday to let me know the buyer flaked out and the Mark was available. I told him about the one I bought.
He is an electrical engineer and huge Mesa fan. We had a nice discussion about the Mesa Mark series amps and I learned a lot. I made a remark that I bought a Carl Martin Plexi-Tone. He found that odd and said the Mesa should be good enough for any of my distortion needs (within reason). I told him I planned on using Channel 1 with the pedal. He told me that he gets great tone on his amp from the Lead channel. He said I should try it. In other words, I don't need a distortion pedal with this amp, or at least his amp.
Today was the first time I got to really play this amp at a proper volume. I went and jammed with some guys but got there early so I could put together a workable tone. Not only is my amp new to me, but so is my PRS.
I did try the Lead channel. I left Volume 1 on about 7, Lead Gain also around 7. I put the Lead Master (pulled) around 7, and then used Master 1 to set the proper overall volume. It never got above 4 and this was playing with a drummer and another guitarist in a garage.
Even if I cranked the Lead Gain up to 10, the Lead channel never got really creamy. It sounded a lot like a Plexi. It was great AC/DC type tone. Amazing. But it wouldn't go any further than that.
It was interesting but the crunch mode on the Plexi-Tone pedal sounded a lot like the Mesa on the Lead channel. Very, very similar. The high gain mode on the pedal didn't sound really good through the Lead channel. It did sound ok through Channel 1 but not what I want. It was a bit too processed when it got to the compression and sustain I want.
I called the guy with the green stripe back. He told me to call him if I wasn't super happy with my amp and wanted to hear his. He told me his amp gets a lot more distortion than what I was describing. He said by the time the Mark III got to the green stripe, the Lead channel had been changed significantly to give higher gain. According to him, even the clean channel was made better along the way.
Is this all true? Based on what I have read, it appears to be.
His green stripe has two mods, performed by Mike B himself. One is a reverb mod, which he said sounds very Twin Reverb-like. The other mod was to Rhythm 2 to fix the huge volume gain you get when going from channel 1 to Rhythm 2.
Is there anyone with a green stripe that can confirm this? I am a total Noob when it comes to the Mark amps (obviously). I had no idea what the engine under the hood was like.
My Mark has an EVM in it and his has a Celestion 80 in it which he said might better suit the sound I am looking for.
This is fun!
Thanks!
Prior to buying this amp I contacted a guy who had a Mark III green stripe for sale on Craigslist. However, he told me someone was buying his Mark. He emailed me on Saturday to let me know the buyer flaked out and the Mark was available. I told him about the one I bought.
He is an electrical engineer and huge Mesa fan. We had a nice discussion about the Mesa Mark series amps and I learned a lot. I made a remark that I bought a Carl Martin Plexi-Tone. He found that odd and said the Mesa should be good enough for any of my distortion needs (within reason). I told him I planned on using Channel 1 with the pedal. He told me that he gets great tone on his amp from the Lead channel. He said I should try it. In other words, I don't need a distortion pedal with this amp, or at least his amp.
Today was the first time I got to really play this amp at a proper volume. I went and jammed with some guys but got there early so I could put together a workable tone. Not only is my amp new to me, but so is my PRS.
I did try the Lead channel. I left Volume 1 on about 7, Lead Gain also around 7. I put the Lead Master (pulled) around 7, and then used Master 1 to set the proper overall volume. It never got above 4 and this was playing with a drummer and another guitarist in a garage.
Even if I cranked the Lead Gain up to 10, the Lead channel never got really creamy. It sounded a lot like a Plexi. It was great AC/DC type tone. Amazing. But it wouldn't go any further than that.
It was interesting but the crunch mode on the Plexi-Tone pedal sounded a lot like the Mesa on the Lead channel. Very, very similar. The high gain mode on the pedal didn't sound really good through the Lead channel. It did sound ok through Channel 1 but not what I want. It was a bit too processed when it got to the compression and sustain I want.
I called the guy with the green stripe back. He told me to call him if I wasn't super happy with my amp and wanted to hear his. He told me his amp gets a lot more distortion than what I was describing. He said by the time the Mark III got to the green stripe, the Lead channel had been changed significantly to give higher gain. According to him, even the clean channel was made better along the way.
Is this all true? Based on what I have read, it appears to be.
His green stripe has two mods, performed by Mike B himself. One is a reverb mod, which he said sounds very Twin Reverb-like. The other mod was to Rhythm 2 to fix the huge volume gain you get when going from channel 1 to Rhythm 2.
Is there anyone with a green stripe that can confirm this? I am a total Noob when it comes to the Mark amps (obviously). I had no idea what the engine under the hood was like.
My Mark has an EVM in it and his has a Celestion 80 in it which he said might better suit the sound I am looking for.
This is fun!
Thanks!