ultra high gain
Active member
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2021
- Messages
- 27
- Reaction score
- 17
Warning: total fanboi lengthy just-plugged-in-once-and-i'm-too-damn-excited review commencing:
Holy ****, I was not expecting this at all. Plenty of punchy bass, and dynamics(?) of this magnitude even though a lot of claims of this amp are of a flatter compressed nature. And ... somehow... Marshally?... a lot of bite and sizzle, but in a smooth Mark kinda way.
You see, I previously owned a mkIV and fully expected to be disappointed at the lack of a pull fat built in, so I was thinking of tinkering with it to add/change a cathode bypass cap or two to make up for that. No need. If schematics are correct, the 1st and 3rd stages of the IV have the 2.2u (1st added with pullfat), but the 3rd stage in the 2C+ is a 15u, and I feel it balances it out perfectly. In any event, it sounds perfect just the way it is. And I'm using an active EMG 57 on the bridge, I'll get more punch and low end with passives too. Maybe the Het set too.?
And - what the hell - I do NOT remember the IV being this dynamic at all. Lower gain settings have a very rich, juicy, punchy, pick-attack-dependent zest that I absolutely was not expecting. The highs sit in just the right place to give it a ballsy grind that hangs with any Marshall, but without any extra fizziness on top. I am a huge Marshall fan too (and Diezel, Engl, Randall, Revv, etc for that matter, tone junkies are sick), and the JP2C can hang with the grindy crowd any day of the week.
Kick in the juicy analog spring reverb with lower gain settings, and it sounds like something EVH himself would have appreciated. Then again, after his Marshall days, he also cranked the **** out of the gain too like the rest of us sick *******s! I definitely wanna check out the 5150III S el34.
Cleans were as expected - lush, smooth, bell-like, chimey, Fender-like, and amazing. And that was just the bridge PU, I haven't even messed yet with the neck, parallel, single coil (my actives are splitable too, yay!), passives, out-of-phase, the unbeatable tele or strat neck PUP, etc. I can't wait to throw some comp, chorus, maybe some other verb and delay - ahhhh. I really do like the built-in spring reverb, there's something I like about most spring verbs that I can't quite put my finger on...
I did not like the pull presence on the IV, it seemed too scooped, but on the JP2C I like both pushed or pulled. I gotta hand it to Petrucci, I totally like the way he sets his amp up, and I did similar settings, and within seconds of tweaking I was in the glory zones. I'm very accustomed to the Mark way of doing things, so it was literally seconds.
I have had no where near the amount of Boogie experience as many others here and abroad have had, but I have owned a handful of Boogies to know how they operate, with the quirky pre-dist tone knobs. I dig the Rectos too. Starting in the 90's, I went from Mark III to Quad Pre, Triaxis, Triple ch Recto, Triaxis again, Dual ch Recto, Mark IV, and now the JP2C. I kind of went full circle back the the beginnings of Boogie metal gain.
I also did not really much prefer the harmonics/mid gain switch of the IV either. I forgot which one, but the less saturated setting is what I left it on. Shred is not like that at all. It bleeds harmonics and edginess without too much fizziness added (IV had the fizzies), I love it! Again, gotta hand it to Mesa and Petrucci, I really like all the sounds and features of this amp, and I'm glad I got it.
The power cable worked it's way out of the socket before I could plug it in, but I was armed with the knowledge of it's quirky location via YouTube, so I expected it to be there, but it was unusual that it came out. After taking the chassis out and reinstalling the cable it had a snug fit. There is an attachment on the headshell to snap into place the cable - and even screw it down securely - but I didn't need to screw it down. Good to know it's there if I need it. I'm a bedroom ******, so no need for now. Plus if it bugs me, I can get a small 6" or 1'extension to plug in the amp, and use the cable to plug into that. I appreciated that the chassis was snugly shifted over to one side of the headshell, making removal and reinsertion a breeze - just put headshell on its side and grab it by the xfmrs, then its just black on red/ silver on white for the reverb tank, done. I have a reissue JCM800 that is not so kind.
I have not experienced the powertube protector before, and it is a pleasant surprise to see. Placement and removal very much reminds me of computer RAM, with the two little levers to engage in order to release. Installing is a snap - just literally snaps into place easily. Ingenious!
As a previous owner of the Triaxis, I was kinda bummed that Mesa decided to ditch all the extra programmability. I was expecting the Mesa equivalent of the Diezel VHX to come out, sans the fx. Nevertheless, I haven't even messed with all the features I do have now with the JP, and I know it will come in handy in tandem with the Helix.
Looking forward to bugging you all with my silly antics in the future...
Holy ****, I was not expecting this at all. Plenty of punchy bass, and dynamics(?) of this magnitude even though a lot of claims of this amp are of a flatter compressed nature. And ... somehow... Marshally?... a lot of bite and sizzle, but in a smooth Mark kinda way.
You see, I previously owned a mkIV and fully expected to be disappointed at the lack of a pull fat built in, so I was thinking of tinkering with it to add/change a cathode bypass cap or two to make up for that. No need. If schematics are correct, the 1st and 3rd stages of the IV have the 2.2u (1st added with pullfat), but the 3rd stage in the 2C+ is a 15u, and I feel it balances it out perfectly. In any event, it sounds perfect just the way it is. And I'm using an active EMG 57 on the bridge, I'll get more punch and low end with passives too. Maybe the Het set too.?
And - what the hell - I do NOT remember the IV being this dynamic at all. Lower gain settings have a very rich, juicy, punchy, pick-attack-dependent zest that I absolutely was not expecting. The highs sit in just the right place to give it a ballsy grind that hangs with any Marshall, but without any extra fizziness on top. I am a huge Marshall fan too (and Diezel, Engl, Randall, Revv, etc for that matter, tone junkies are sick), and the JP2C can hang with the grindy crowd any day of the week.
Kick in the juicy analog spring reverb with lower gain settings, and it sounds like something EVH himself would have appreciated. Then again, after his Marshall days, he also cranked the **** out of the gain too like the rest of us sick *******s! I definitely wanna check out the 5150III S el34.
Cleans were as expected - lush, smooth, bell-like, chimey, Fender-like, and amazing. And that was just the bridge PU, I haven't even messed yet with the neck, parallel, single coil (my actives are splitable too, yay!), passives, out-of-phase, the unbeatable tele or strat neck PUP, etc. I can't wait to throw some comp, chorus, maybe some other verb and delay - ahhhh. I really do like the built-in spring reverb, there's something I like about most spring verbs that I can't quite put my finger on...
I did not like the pull presence on the IV, it seemed too scooped, but on the JP2C I like both pushed or pulled. I gotta hand it to Petrucci, I totally like the way he sets his amp up, and I did similar settings, and within seconds of tweaking I was in the glory zones. I'm very accustomed to the Mark way of doing things, so it was literally seconds.
I have had no where near the amount of Boogie experience as many others here and abroad have had, but I have owned a handful of Boogies to know how they operate, with the quirky pre-dist tone knobs. I dig the Rectos too. Starting in the 90's, I went from Mark III to Quad Pre, Triaxis, Triple ch Recto, Triaxis again, Dual ch Recto, Mark IV, and now the JP2C. I kind of went full circle back the the beginnings of Boogie metal gain.
I also did not really much prefer the harmonics/mid gain switch of the IV either. I forgot which one, but the less saturated setting is what I left it on. Shred is not like that at all. It bleeds harmonics and edginess without too much fizziness added (IV had the fizzies), I love it! Again, gotta hand it to Mesa and Petrucci, I really like all the sounds and features of this amp, and I'm glad I got it.
The power cable worked it's way out of the socket before I could plug it in, but I was armed with the knowledge of it's quirky location via YouTube, so I expected it to be there, but it was unusual that it came out. After taking the chassis out and reinstalling the cable it had a snug fit. There is an attachment on the headshell to snap into place the cable - and even screw it down securely - but I didn't need to screw it down. Good to know it's there if I need it. I'm a bedroom ******, so no need for now. Plus if it bugs me, I can get a small 6" or 1'extension to plug in the amp, and use the cable to plug into that. I appreciated that the chassis was snugly shifted over to one side of the headshell, making removal and reinsertion a breeze - just put headshell on its side and grab it by the xfmrs, then its just black on red/ silver on white for the reverb tank, done. I have a reissue JCM800 that is not so kind.
I have not experienced the powertube protector before, and it is a pleasant surprise to see. Placement and removal very much reminds me of computer RAM, with the two little levers to engage in order to release. Installing is a snap - just literally snaps into place easily. Ingenious!
As a previous owner of the Triaxis, I was kinda bummed that Mesa decided to ditch all the extra programmability. I was expecting the Mesa equivalent of the Diezel VHX to come out, sans the fx. Nevertheless, I haven't even messed with all the features I do have now with the JP, and I know it will come in handy in tandem with the Helix.
Looking forward to bugging you all with my silly antics in the future...