Garrrhhh !!!!
Mesa and Marshal comparisons. The worst thing ever did tha was solid state on the MK I and IIB with the Fetron. Other than that and the Triaxis is all tube. Now, being a Mesa purist and fanatic, I will admit to the fact that I have recently had 2 2555 Silve Jubilees. For using diode clipping, in this amp Marshall did an amazing job. They string a few 1N4007's and two red LED's. Not only do the sound good, but when the chassis is out the LED,s light up with your signal. The 2555 is by no means a gain monster and they do sound different from early production to late. I sold the early version as it was too bright for $ 1900 and kept the full stack I bought. It is a sight to see a full Jubilee Full Stack and one I have only seen once before by a local guy with a 2553 full stack. It has a voice all it's own and diode clippinf or not, it is a special amp. For my hot rodded Marshall tones I never hesitate to bring out the most audiophile grade Marhsall copy there is. The Soldano SLO 100. That is one wicked Marshall knock off and I have run it with EL34, bit prefer GT KT 66HP's. They also mix well with a Dual Rec and MK series. So for a real Marshall crunch, I can break out the real deal. In my setting, I can tell you thay the MK III and MK IV R2 dont have the Jubilee vibe, but in most cases, The R2's in Mesa's have much more girth at reasonable to high volumes. Then again, they are totally different amp. The Marshall is a higher gain Bassman type circuit, but with the tone controls after the preamp whereas the Mesa uses the EQ right after the first gain stage. They are not voiced to sound like a Marshall and do not have many similarities in overall design and gain stage component values. I have a sweet spot for the Jubiilee 2555 with a Boss GE-7 in the loop. I dont sound like Slash, but it's **** close. I attibute this to the simple fact that I am not runnign KT88's, but more obvious, I am not Slash.