Russ said:I actually want to hear the difference between a pre500 and this one too. This Dual has a parallel loop but it seems its a very early parallel loop model. The amp I am buying is in immaculate shape and is a hard deal to pass up. It doesn't hurt that it belongs to a neighbor. I won't even have to ship it. The traditional cab that it is coming with it is immaculate as well. The tube complement is nice too. Nothing like a full set of NOS power tubes along with a full set of new preamp tubes to round out an already killer deal. I can't pass it up. Worst case scenario is that I find a pre500 that I like better then this one becomes a backup or the other half of a stereo rig, or even sold off to make room for something else (maybe even a 2210 replacement). I am actually hoping more of my other gear sells off first so that I don't have to sell the 2210.
Russ said:That sounds like a real dilemma to me. There is nothing that will give you the vintage sound of a JTM-45. Even in the RI you still have the option of a HW upgrade. I would look into that for the JTM-45. PTP that baby. That would be my resolution for that amp. Those JTM's have a special sound. If I were to have remained true to my Marshall roots I would have one of those right now. I would also be GAS-ing over an old Super Tremolo or two.
rabies said:Russ said:I have hte $ in my pocket. The Dual is waiting. I just have to coordinate a time to pick it up. I figure worse case scenario I don't like the head and I sell it to get a pre500 or save some more after that and get a IIC+ or another Mark IV. I think I am done with the 800 for a while. That kind of hurt watching it drive away down the street.
Well it hurt to sell my 2205 but I'd rather somebody actually be using it. I do miss it for wah/funk/hard rock stuff that it's better suited for than my Mk III or RK1. But I much rather have a simul-class amp right now. Plus who wants to bias an amp and worry about that going out of bias, etc?
Another Mark IV??? WTF? Why do you want/need another one? You trying to run a stereo setup like Morton of LOG?
You're going to get bored with the DR, just wait. Rectos are very one-dimensional.
rabies said:You want a Mark IV considering your current equipment. Trust me on this one.
rabies said:*DOPEMAN* said:rabies said:You want a Mark IV considering your current equipment. Trust me on this one.
I think it's between the Lonestar and a Mark IV. I play a lot of blues and funk but I like to crank s@!$ up and play metal sometimes too. The Mark IV looks like a great amp but I really need to try one out... same with the Lonestar.
What do most people use their Mark IV for?
Well a lot of the Mark IV guys are hardrock/metal bands (LOG, Metallica, Chevelle, Sevendust).
But the clean channel on that is like a Fender clean (very spanky and bright, not dark and mushy like the RK1). It's a usable clean channel for funk or anything else. In addition, you get sick gain and crunch with the lead channel. It has a R2 channel as well that most people aren't too hot about but the R2 on my Mk III green is decent when volume is cranked.
You also get the classA or simul-class options with the Mark III/IV. It's a very flexible tone machine. I don't know why more bands don't use it...
Enter your email address to join: