eagle said:
masque said:
yeh while your at it try one of those Pods I hear they wipe the floor with the Triaxis too! :wink:
Surely you are not so stupid as to think that those pre's don't give the Triaxis at least a run ,as for your pod comment :roll: .
These are all tube all analogue no op-amps ,which is more than can be said for the Triaxis .Triaxis is good but these are better ,If someone is going to spend a couple of grand on a preamp you'd have to be mad not to check out the competition.
*Rant start*
Great but those preamps are mostly based on a marshall tone and not a mark series tone and don't even offer a simulation of a 5 band GEQ (even as limited as it is on the TA).
I don't understand your point about opampless preamps are better than this or that. Do you use any effects or any analog/digital pedals? Does your guitar have a preamp built in? If you answer yes then you are running through opamps, diodes, AD/DA converters, and a lot of other stuff that is seemingly toxic to purists.
I am not knocking any other brands but your reasoning seems a little whacked.
This isn't a debate of what you know as a good preamp it's what the OP wants (it seems as though he wants something along the lines of a Mark series amp). Would you discount all of Mesa's amps since there are transistors inside? There are also IC chips in some of their amps too for instance: the models without tube reverb use an opamp to drive the verb. Does that mean we should all boycot mesa and look to any brand dedicated to designing their amps without ICs, transistors, or diodes? well, maybe for you but as long as it works and sounds good I'm happy.
*Rant over*
Greg