jjb said:Van den Hul.
Brewski said:jjb said:Van den Hul.
Those are supposed to best out there according to the Lava site, but the price is pretty dear. Do you hear a big difference from other upper end cables or is it subtle?
theaero said:my thoughts about monster cable:
the monster cable that is supposed to be for a certain music type... such as monster acoustic cable, monster rock cable, monster bass cable, etc, is not only pointless, but worse in the long run.
Does it emphize and cut certain frequencies out, and claim it is better for ______ type of music?
:evil:
Bad!
phaboo said:theaero said:my thoughts about monster cable:
the monster cable that is supposed to be for a certain music type... such as monster acoustic cable, monster rock cable, monster bass cable, etc, is not only pointless, but worse in the long run.
Does it emphize and cut certain frequencies out, and claim it is better for ______ type of music?
:evil:
Bad!
Emphasize/cut certain frequencies? It's a wire. Period. It's just a wire.
If you have a VERY long cable run, you'll see some diminished bass and some diminished treble (due to capacitance, since the signal wire runs close to the ground in an unbalanced cable), but it's just wire.
I use 12 gauge for speaker wire, mostly because I have long runs and the heavier gauge shows less loss over a long run. Monster is good cable, but it is overpriced and you can get stuff just as good for a fraction of the cost.
For the rest of it, the most important thing is that it stands up to being hauled around and banged on. You can have crappy cable (ie, it crackles when you twist it because it was simply poorly made or someone wasn't paying attention when they put on the connectors or something) but if you ran a true blind A/B test with different instrument cables I seriously doubt anyone would be able to tell the difference.
If you think it will sound better, then it WILL sound better.
Enter your email address to join: