Ok, I've seen the videos of a mark IIC+ and seen the comments of members here. Makes me GASing for a IIC+ really bad. I've never played a C+ in person so there's a risk if I buy it online.
I'm happy for my current rig. If I can afford buying a new amp without selling the 2 amps, I would rather do that. But do you think IIC+ > IV+reco? I understand that even the 2 amp setup have more versatility but is it worth it to go for the cream of the crop sound rather than keeping 2 above average (mark IV is way above average and the recto's just on par) amps?
BTW, tone wise, I dont really care about the massiveness of the rectos but I rather enjoy the tightness of the Mark series.
I'm happy for my current rig. If I can afford buying a new amp without selling the 2 amps, I would rather do that. But do you think IIC+ > IV+reco? I understand that even the 2 amp setup have more versatility but is it worth it to go for the cream of the crop sound rather than keeping 2 above average (mark IV is way above average and the recto's just on par) amps?
BTW, tone wise, I dont really care about the massiveness of the rectos but I rather enjoy the tightness of the Mark series.