I'm not doing a resonance control, as they only add bass by shorting the feedback at low frequencies.
------
I've been reading through
Richard Kuehnel's excellent book on power amp design with a copy of the 3 Channel Recto schematic. From the PI design, to the coupling caps, to the bias circuit, this power amp was really not meant to be overdriven. These were really, really intentional design choices.
While a person may prefer more distortion from their power amp, I've been calculating that going beyond much further than spec will cause the screen to go over it's maximum dissipation limit and cause a failure. Even if a particular set of tubes' characteristics work with a bias change, the screen may still be driven close to max and fail prematurely.
I calculated that it takes 2.8 ms to make the grid draw current and 12 ms to recover, with a reduction in power of about 30%. By comparison, Marshalls are mostly in the area of 1 ms, 5.7 ms, and 29%, respectively.
There are examples in the book of amps with similar excursion characteristics. The closest are Vox amps, particularly the AC10 and AC15. Aside from Vox, the amps with longer times are mostly Fender, Epiphone, and Gibson, and tend to be super clean push/pull amps or are Class A amps attempting to extend headroom.
So the Dual Rectifier power amp is meant to stay "clean" and retain full power conditions (likely for low freq reproduction). To mod it for distortion, the coupling caps to the grid need to be smaller and the screen resistors need to be smaller, but power reduction, blocking distortion, and Miller capacitance may be issues. Since it's a master volume amp with significant preamp drive, I don't think messing with any of that is necessary.