Oh my God. This is it.
OK, It's big. But I can not imagine a setup with better flexibility in dialing in 3 or 4 awsome tone settings.
Let me tell you a bit:
- I sold my Mark IV combo, because I couldn't find a good setting for all 3 channels. It's always a compromise. Clean and Crunch share tone settings, and the graphic EQ is common to all channels.
On the other hand, I loved the Simul Class poweramp! Nothing compares in fullness and warlth...
- Another thing about the Mark IV: didn't like the speaker too much. Too clean and bright. So I found myself playing the Mark IV through a Marshall 4x12 with Greenbacks all the time. Great tone, but a Mark IV (Hardwood) combo is heavy enough as it is, if you only use it as a head, it becomes ridiculous...
So I thought, I can change over to a head in stead, or hey why not a rack setup?
- Enter the Quad. This baby, while not small, gave me all the flexibility I wanted and the tone is not so much different from the Mark IV anyway (at least not the tone I was looking for). I have 2 graphic EQ's and a bunch of tone shaping features (like mixing the channels) + a state of the art reverb. But what Poweramp to use? I liked the 2:90 for it's Simul Class and size but not for it's price. The 295 is big and lacks some flexibility...
- Enter the 395. I happened to find one and got it for a good price... This baby is more flexible than the 2:90 and was priced like a 295. OK, it's one rack space bigger than the 2:90, but it's not gona be a lot heavier?!
- Result: I have now about the same thing I had (Mark preamp + Simul Class poweramp), but stereo. And at half the price.
With the money I got for my Mark IV hardwood combo, I bought the Quad and the 395 + the best part of a second hand Les Paul!!
One question: I can only find a very small pdf operating manual of the 395 on the Mesa website. Almost no pictures or documentation on the net. Can anybody help me with some documentation on the 395? Why is there almost nothing to be found? Was it that short in production?
OK, It's big. But I can not imagine a setup with better flexibility in dialing in 3 or 4 awsome tone settings.
Let me tell you a bit:
- I sold my Mark IV combo, because I couldn't find a good setting for all 3 channels. It's always a compromise. Clean and Crunch share tone settings, and the graphic EQ is common to all channels.
On the other hand, I loved the Simul Class poweramp! Nothing compares in fullness and warlth...
- Another thing about the Mark IV: didn't like the speaker too much. Too clean and bright. So I found myself playing the Mark IV through a Marshall 4x12 with Greenbacks all the time. Great tone, but a Mark IV (Hardwood) combo is heavy enough as it is, if you only use it as a head, it becomes ridiculous...
So I thought, I can change over to a head in stead, or hey why not a rack setup?
- Enter the Quad. This baby, while not small, gave me all the flexibility I wanted and the tone is not so much different from the Mark IV anyway (at least not the tone I was looking for). I have 2 graphic EQ's and a bunch of tone shaping features (like mixing the channels) + a state of the art reverb. But what Poweramp to use? I liked the 2:90 for it's Simul Class and size but not for it's price. The 295 is big and lacks some flexibility...
- Enter the 395. I happened to find one and got it for a good price... This baby is more flexible than the 2:90 and was priced like a 295. OK, it's one rack space bigger than the 2:90, but it's not gona be a lot heavier?!
- Result: I have now about the same thing I had (Mark preamp + Simul Class poweramp), but stereo. And at half the price.
With the money I got for my Mark IV hardwood combo, I bought the Quad and the 395 + the best part of a second hand Les Paul!!
One question: I can only find a very small pdf operating manual of the 395 on the Mesa website. Almost no pictures or documentation on the net. Can anybody help me with some documentation on the 395? Why is there almost nothing to be found? Was it that short in production?