CaliforniaBoogie said:Kippie and David,
How close is the JP2C to a DRG? I've always preferred the DRG to any of the other variations, and to me it's a pretty noticeable difference. I'm concerned that the JP2C will be more similar to a HRG than a DRG, which wouldn't work for me.
Also, I'm somewhat confused about the "versatility" aspect of the JP2C compared to the original. I don't know about you guys, but the absence of Vol 1 seems pretty significant and to me really hampers my mental picture of how versatile the JP2C is - in terms of pure tone - compared to the IIC+. Does the JP2C do mid-gain tones as well as the IIC+?
Hopefully I get the chance to play the amp soon.
(I had to go back and look up "HRG" (100/60 Watt) vs "DRG" (Simulclass), both with reverb and graphic eq). I knew "DRG" meant "loaded" but didn't realize that the 'D' denoted the power amp configuration.
As far as the volume 1 sweep is concerned, coming from my Mark III, I'd say there's excellent coverage unless you want it set solidly to '10'. You've got the clean channel which basically covers values up to around 4 or 5, channel 2 covers about 7 to 8, and channel 3 covers about 8 to 9.
You could argue that you're boxed in to which channel you have to use based on the desired range, but honestly, which a iic+ or a III, you're boxed into whatever value you dialed for the *entire amp*.
I realize this may not suit your needs, I'm just saying why it doesn't bother me compared to my Mark III. I often had the volume up to 8 or 9, but not 10 after I got more serious about recording. This hits the sweet spot for me.