So I went to demo a Mark IV today against the dual rectifier and now I'm more confused than before.
I tried a ton of different Mark settings and it just wasn't all the magic people talk it up to be. I think compared to the recto it had a sweeter tone and had tighter tracking but it wasn't THAT much of a blowaway difference from my Dual Rec to make me instantly want to trade mine for one. In a lot of the settings, the Mark IV sounded very transistory and didn't have anywhere close to the touch dynamics that my Stiletto Ace has. On top of that, it sounded WAY bassier than the dual rec which blew my mind... furthermore with an overdrive on my DR, I can cop the same sort of mark liquid tone but have a much more punchy menacing distortion tone.
The weirdest thing was that the guy at the shop was actually trying to show me stuff to make me NOT want to purchase a Mark IV, very unlike most guitar shops I've been in, he was honest and actually demoed what he was talking about against the DR directly. The settings he chose were VERY bizarre on the DR, something I never would have tried (cranking the output, keeping the channel masters BELOW 9 o clock, wiping out the mids, cranking gain, very unorthodox settings, but honestly it took all the crappy fizz out of the DR preamp section that I hate and really made me reconsider this whole thing. Funny how 'bad' settings can sound exactly like what you've wanted to hear but intuition tells you not to dial them that way.
Anyway, I need to retest them both I think, I just had such high hopes for the Mark IV and it really didn't show me anything that my DR or my Stiletto couldn't get 95% there on. Am I losing my mind or has anyone felt something similar?
I tried a ton of different Mark settings and it just wasn't all the magic people talk it up to be. I think compared to the recto it had a sweeter tone and had tighter tracking but it wasn't THAT much of a blowaway difference from my Dual Rec to make me instantly want to trade mine for one. In a lot of the settings, the Mark IV sounded very transistory and didn't have anywhere close to the touch dynamics that my Stiletto Ace has. On top of that, it sounded WAY bassier than the dual rec which blew my mind... furthermore with an overdrive on my DR, I can cop the same sort of mark liquid tone but have a much more punchy menacing distortion tone.
The weirdest thing was that the guy at the shop was actually trying to show me stuff to make me NOT want to purchase a Mark IV, very unlike most guitar shops I've been in, he was honest and actually demoed what he was talking about against the DR directly. The settings he chose were VERY bizarre on the DR, something I never would have tried (cranking the output, keeping the channel masters BELOW 9 o clock, wiping out the mids, cranking gain, very unorthodox settings, but honestly it took all the crappy fizz out of the DR preamp section that I hate and really made me reconsider this whole thing. Funny how 'bad' settings can sound exactly like what you've wanted to hear but intuition tells you not to dial them that way.
Anyway, I need to retest them both I think, I just had such high hopes for the Mark IV and it really didn't show me anything that my DR or my Stiletto couldn't get 95% there on. Am I losing my mind or has anyone felt something similar?