braintheory said:
I didn't mean an upgraded c+. I meant an earlier mark ii (like a iib or iic) that was sent back to mesa to be upgraded to a iic+. Mine was a iic+ from the very beginning, making it more valuable, but I've even seen a lot of earlier mark ii's converted to c+'s go for as much and more than I'm asking. I guess I was a little unclear.
snorkel54 said:
Tell me why a upgraded c+ is nonesens!??
SORRY I HAVE THE QUOTES IN THE WRONG ORDER
I can't say for sure about the an earlier mark ll b's but a mark llc that was sent back to to mesa to be upgraded to a C+ it exactly the same amp with the possible exception of the power transformer according to Mike B. at boogie. And there are some who say they like the original ll C 100 PT better. That is a "to each his own" topic. When you say your amp is "not upgraded or any of that nonsense", to give you the benefit of the doubt, I believe the verbiage you used was intended simply to make the point, factory C+'s buy and sell for more money for the most part over the upgraded ones. You would have a much better chance selling your amp if you provided more information. Is it 60 watts, 100 watts or simulclass? Dose it have a 105 PT or X 101 export trans. What speaker is in it? And of course photos, I wouldn't try to sell a $3000.00 (or whatever) amp without posting images.