BoogieMun
New member
Any opinions are welcome. Good. Bad. Indifferent. Whatever.
I've had the great thrill of making my way through quite a few different amps throughout my 10 years or so of playing guitar. I'm in my early 20's now and nearing the end of college so financially (although I've been lucky enough to have had a job at my age that supplied enough to afford pro-quality gear) I've never been able to afford to keep all of what I've purchased at one time. When I'm interested in trying something else out or simply am not satisfied with what I have, it certainly seems like 9 times out of 10 I have to get rid of something to afford something else. I'm sure many of you can relate.
Anyhow, my interests are pretty diverse musically as I'm sure many of yours' are as well, thus I've never been trusting enough to go to Boogie for all my needs and luckily enough I'm currently being thrilled by a Suhr Badger which is holding down the fort for all of my more "traditional" or "classic rock" indulgences. Honestly, that's the only non-Boogie tone I really like to have around.
As far as Boogie's go, I've made my way through 4 or 5 amps. I started with a Rect-O-Verb, upgraded to a Dual Recto Solo Head and then moved over to the Mark's in an attempt to get a more articulate and tight tone. I like the "bigness" if you will of the Recto's and certainly the saturated sound, but the Mark's seemed a little more fitting for a player like me. One of my biggest influences in John Petrucci, so the Mark's definitely made sense in that regard.
Anyhow, to get to the point, I've just about had enough of the Mark series frustrations. I've had my current Mark III for quite awhile. Although they are capable of some amazing tones when layered in high quality studios, in person I've always felt my sound was just nowhere near are thick and "big" to use that word again. My tone is always somewhat weak and although focused and articulate, never what I would call powerful.
I guess I'm interested to see if anyone here made a similar transition from the Mark's to the RoadKing or the Roadster. I'd also love to hear some honest evaluation of the two amps. I'd love to indulge with the "Progressive-Linkage" but undoubtedly could live without it as I have for some time now. To go back to what I was talking about earlier, I'm definitely getting to a point where gear is becoming less of a hobby and more of a nuisance. I want to "settle down" if you will and the RoadKing (or the Roadster) seems like an amp which could really provide a range of tones that is not only diverse but really musical--and would be a great reason to get the hell off Ebay, too!
One other important thing I should ask is if the RoadSters are coming with the LoneStar channel like the newer RoadKings. I would assume they are but Mesa's site is just a bit vague on that unless I missed it. I was in a bit of a hurry when browsing through it this afternoon.
Also, are the 4-channels all slightly different in their voicing? Do they basically increase with gain along with slight tonal twists or is it basically 2xCleans/2xOverdrives?
PS:
Not that I want to necessarily copy Joe, but since I spent about all last week loving his latest album, Professor Satchifunkilus. I'd love to know if anyone is using the RoadKing to go after a slightly more modern-Satriani type sound. Any input on the middle ground of the RoadKing's tonal spectrum is much appreciated. Anyone rolling off the volume knob and really testing the dynamic capabilities of these things?
THANK YOU to anyone who read all that!!!
I've had the great thrill of making my way through quite a few different amps throughout my 10 years or so of playing guitar. I'm in my early 20's now and nearing the end of college so financially (although I've been lucky enough to have had a job at my age that supplied enough to afford pro-quality gear) I've never been able to afford to keep all of what I've purchased at one time. When I'm interested in trying something else out or simply am not satisfied with what I have, it certainly seems like 9 times out of 10 I have to get rid of something to afford something else. I'm sure many of you can relate.
Anyhow, my interests are pretty diverse musically as I'm sure many of yours' are as well, thus I've never been trusting enough to go to Boogie for all my needs and luckily enough I'm currently being thrilled by a Suhr Badger which is holding down the fort for all of my more "traditional" or "classic rock" indulgences. Honestly, that's the only non-Boogie tone I really like to have around.
As far as Boogie's go, I've made my way through 4 or 5 amps. I started with a Rect-O-Verb, upgraded to a Dual Recto Solo Head and then moved over to the Mark's in an attempt to get a more articulate and tight tone. I like the "bigness" if you will of the Recto's and certainly the saturated sound, but the Mark's seemed a little more fitting for a player like me. One of my biggest influences in John Petrucci, so the Mark's definitely made sense in that regard.
Anyhow, to get to the point, I've just about had enough of the Mark series frustrations. I've had my current Mark III for quite awhile. Although they are capable of some amazing tones when layered in high quality studios, in person I've always felt my sound was just nowhere near are thick and "big" to use that word again. My tone is always somewhat weak and although focused and articulate, never what I would call powerful.
I guess I'm interested to see if anyone here made a similar transition from the Mark's to the RoadKing or the Roadster. I'd also love to hear some honest evaluation of the two amps. I'd love to indulge with the "Progressive-Linkage" but undoubtedly could live without it as I have for some time now. To go back to what I was talking about earlier, I'm definitely getting to a point where gear is becoming less of a hobby and more of a nuisance. I want to "settle down" if you will and the RoadKing (or the Roadster) seems like an amp which could really provide a range of tones that is not only diverse but really musical--and would be a great reason to get the hell off Ebay, too!
One other important thing I should ask is if the RoadSters are coming with the LoneStar channel like the newer RoadKings. I would assume they are but Mesa's site is just a bit vague on that unless I missed it. I was in a bit of a hurry when browsing through it this afternoon.
Also, are the 4-channels all slightly different in their voicing? Do they basically increase with gain along with slight tonal twists or is it basically 2xCleans/2xOverdrives?
PS:
Not that I want to necessarily copy Joe, but since I spent about all last week loving his latest album, Professor Satchifunkilus. I'd love to know if anyone is using the RoadKing to go after a slightly more modern-Satriani type sound. Any input on the middle ground of the RoadKing's tonal spectrum is much appreciated. Anyone rolling off the volume knob and really testing the dynamic capabilities of these things?
THANK YOU to anyone who read all that!!!