Guitar GeeK said:I aggre with MusicManJP6, Gibsons are a huge hit and miss. Also, if you do end up with a Gibson; be warned. I you use strings with a higher gauge then 9-46, the headstock will snap off and nail you in the face. Gibson doesn't reenforce their head stocks, they don't even add a valute to the neck. Another thing to consider. the way that they attatch their necks are also flawed. They only have wood on their necks touch the body were the 22nd fret is. If you move around when you play, then the guitar will go out of tune left and right.
I hope so. Not many things are as classic as a Gibson Les Paul. I would love to own a few of them eventually, but quality scares the hell out of me. And I've heard of necks snapping for no good reason. Heard a few horror stories of guys that go to get their LPs out of the case to find the headstock snapped. Hope it doesn't happen to me!GD_NC said:Gibson has really stepped up the QC over the past couple of years and automated much of their production to eliminate variability.
GD_NC said:Guitar GeeK said:I aggre with MusicManJP6, Gibsons are a huge hit and miss. Also, if you do end up with a Gibson; be warned. I you use strings with a higher gauge then 9-46, the headstock will snap off and nail you in the face. Gibson doesn't reenforce their head stocks, they don't even add a valute to the neck. Another thing to consider. the way that they attatch their necks are also flawed. They only have wood on their necks touch the body were the 22nd fret is. If you move around when you play, then the guitar will go out of tune left and right.
Wow! Everybody is entitled to an opinion, but the quote above is just ridiculous.
I've played and owned many Gibson over the past 25 years with models that have ranged from the mid 70's - 2009. An have never heard of, or seen, a headstock snapping off from heavy gauge strings. I've personally never used anything lighter than .10's on mine. Yes, the necks break easy if you drop one. (This is especially true of the 3 piece maple necks from the 70's, which I might add, also have volutes.) Some Les Pauls weigh almost 12 LBS! Dropping one can do damage to a lot of things. Get some straplocks and don't act like Pete Townsend and your Gibson will be just fine. Anyone dropped a PRS on the headstock?
In my experience, Gibson's two-piece bridge/tailpiece system stays in tune extremely well. I've NEVER had one go out of tune because of the neck joint. And, for what it's worth, most Gibson necks attach at the 16th-18th fret not the 22nd.
Gibson has varied neck materials, shapes, neck glue joints and Corporate ownership many times over the past 50 year of making electric guitars. It's simply not accurate to make sweeping statements that lump them all together. I'll be the first to agree that some are better than others. But plenty of them are excellent guitars. Gibson has really stepped up the QC over the past couple of years and automated much of their production to eliminate variability. They are building some really nice stuff at the moment.
That's a beauty! I'll bet it sounds unbelievable too!JOEY B. said:Yeah, right :lol: .
Those Gibsons won't take any abuse. Here are pics of the '71 that I have owned for over 20 years. It is strung with .010-.046 strings tuned to standard E, and has been dropped at least once due to a failed Schaller straplock. Red loctite fixed the straplock problem, though. It also stays in tune quite well for its age. :roll: :roll: :roll:
I'll be darned, a valute!JOEY B. said:Yeah, right :lol: .
Those Gibsons won't take any abuse. Here are pics of the '71 that I have owned for over 20 years. It is strung with .010-.046 strings tuned to standard E, and has been dropped at least once due to a failed Schaller straplock. Red loctite fixed the straplock problem, though. It also stays in tune quite well for its age. :roll: :roll: :roll:
Guitar GeeK said:I'll be darned, a valute!
Gibson has made Lp's with valutes(my '82 Custom,for ex.)-one of the biggest complaints was the fact the valute actually weakened the neckGuitar GeeK said:I aggre with MusicManJP6, Gibsons are a huge hit and miss. Also, if you do end up with a Gibson; be warned. I you use strings with a higher gauge then 9-46, the headstock will snap off and nail you in the face. Gibson doesn't reenforce their head stocks, they don't even add a valute to the neck. Another thing to consider. the way that they attatch their necks are also flawed. They only have wood on their necks touch the body were the 22nd fret is. If you move around when you play, then the guitar will go out of tune left and right.
But that's not what you wrote. Being that the LP neck has 22 frets, the image conjured was virtually impossible, so I figured that's not what you meant.Guitar GeeK said:GD_NC said:Guitar GeeK said:They only have wood on their necks touch the body were the 22nd fret is. If you move around when you play, then the guitar will go out of tune left and right.
In my experience, Gibson's two-piece bridge/tailpiece system stays in tune extremely well. I've NEVER had one go out of tune because of the neck joint. And, for what it's worth, most Gibson necks attach at the 16th-18th fret not the 22nd.
First off, I was not talking about dropping the guitar, the neck could break at any time. Secondly, I know were the Gibson necks are attatched at, I was talking about were the neck exetends to.
Enter your email address to join: