couple of questions

[boogieslayer]

this is a IIc correct?...sn is 119XX

i did call mesa boogie and it has been verified as being built in 1983

 

[boogieslayer]

nobody?

 

[igfraso]

I would say it is a IIC.

 

[boogieslayer]

very nice

thanks for the link

 

[bryan_kilco]

I dont understand why a lot of Boogies dont have they model name printed on them? I see a lot of people trying to figure out what Boogie they have....weird.

 

[dodger916]

I dont understand why a lot of Boogies dont have they model name printed on them? I see a lot of people trying to figure out what Boogie they have....weird.

That's half the fun! :wink:

 

[MrMarkIII]

I dont understand why a lot of Boogies dont have they model name printed on them? I see a lot of people trying to figure out what Boogie they have....weird.

That's half the fun! :wink:

... And you have to be initiated into the holy priesthood.
Not everyone is accepted. Oops, I've said too much... :lol:

 

[JOEY B.]

... And you have to be initiated into the holy priesthood.
Not everyone is accepted. Oops, I've said too much... :lol:

I know a guy who has owned a total of three MkIIC+ amps including one with the "++" mod, and still prefers the sound of his red stripe MarkIII. The C+ is not everyone's ideal Boogie, for sure. 8)