erickompositör72
Well-known member
And if so, how long ago did you, and are you satisfied?
My IIc+ is a DRX (non-graphic), and I actually find myself playing mostly without "pull deep" engaged. My aim in the most singing, vocal, harmonically-rich lead tone. I'm not in it for the tight rhythm crunch (I actually have a late IIb DRGX that does it quite well, whenever I need my fix of that).
I understand the appeal of the IIc+ rhythm sound, but I find that the amp shines most for leads (esp. w/o "pull deep," even with decent amounts of gain). Anyone else who loves these sounds from their IIc+: how does the V compare? Curious about every iteration (90, 35, 25).
I ask because I'm wondering if I really need a 5k piece of gear. Maybe I do!
Present: Mark IIc+ DRX (RP11), Mark IIb DRGX (RP9C)
My IIc+ is a DRX (non-graphic), and I actually find myself playing mostly without "pull deep" engaged. My aim in the most singing, vocal, harmonically-rich lead tone. I'm not in it for the tight rhythm crunch (I actually have a late IIb DRGX that does it quite well, whenever I need my fix of that).
I understand the appeal of the IIc+ rhythm sound, but I find that the amp shines most for leads (esp. w/o "pull deep," even with decent amounts of gain). Anyone else who loves these sounds from their IIc+: how does the V compare? Curious about every iteration (90, 35, 25).
I ask because I'm wondering if I really need a 5k piece of gear. Maybe I do!
Present: Mark IIc+ DRX (RP11), Mark IIb DRGX (RP9C)