fbomb
Well-known member
to avoid using fx loop,cant you just slave out of the amp into fx unit or pedals and another speaker? would you also need a seperate pwr amp?this way you would have one dry cab and one wet cab.would this work?
fbomb said:to avoid using fx loop,cant you just slave out of the amp into fx unit or pedals and another speaker? would you also need a seperate pwr amp?this way you would have one dry cab and one wet cab.would this work?
Boogiebabies said:The reason is simply more circuitry in the signal path and the lowered value of the cathode caps on the loop. Generally, I am sure we can all agree that they notice th bottom end dissapear when the loop is engaged.
The use of 2.2uf or lower value cathode caps is the culprit. The RK I and Dual Rectifier use a 2.2uf and I hated the loop for killing my bottom end. The RK II has been revised and uses a 10uf cap to add the bottom back. The higher value cap, the more lower frequencies you will hear. The same theory is a common issue with parallel loops as well.
Older Boogie return designs basically saw a 120pf cap for some edge and 15uf cathode cap. To me it seemed like a pretty decent serial loop with minimal coloration.
Enter your email address to join: