• If you have bought, sold or gained information from our Classifieds, please donate toThe Boogie Board and give back.

    You can become a Supporting Member which comes with a decal or just click here to donate.

Sold / Withdrawn WTB Five Band Graphic EQ

The Boogie Board

Help Support The Boogie Board:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Doug Doppler

Well-known member
Boogie Supporter
Joined
Oct 23, 2023
Messages
72
Reaction score
85
Hello fellow Boogie fanatics! I'm in serious need of a second Five Band Graphic EQ for my dual amp setup - anybody got one they're not using and would like to find a loving home for? TIA

Scammers need not reply, I'm not that desperate.
 
I propose an alternative. The 5 band EQ is useful but it's a blunt instrument. It allows only some very coarse tone shaping.

I bypass the 5 band EQ in my Mark III and run a 31 band EQ in the effects loop instead.. It's such an incredibly precise and flexible tone shaping tool, once you get used to it and the tones you can craft with it, you'll never use anything else again.

I favor the Alesis DEQ series digital equalizers. DEQ-230 and DEQ-830D.
 
I propose an alternative. The 5 band EQ is useful but it's a blunt instrument. It allows only some very coarse tone shaping.

I bypass the 5 band EQ in my Mark III and run a 31 band EQ in the effects loop instead.. It's such an incredibly precise and flexible tone shaping tool, once you get used to it and the tones you can craft with it, you'll never use anything else again.

I favor the Alesis DEQ series digital equalizers. DEQ-230 and DEQ-830D.
I use 31-band graphic EQ in my bass amp FX loops, but I use a 10-band parametric EQ in my Mark V FX loop, along with the 5-band GEQ. Parametric is so much more versatile and is especially useful for high gain guitar, where the frequencies that need to be cut are very specific, and narrow bandwidth cuts are ideal. I can cut all the different wonky mid frequencies with narrow bandwidths to get a scooped-ish tone without actually gouging out all the mids. And I can cut the harsh overtones in distortion (~2160Hz) with very narrow bandwidths, so it doesn't darken the whole high end.
The fixed bandwidths of graphic EQ are too wide, and cutting just one mid frequency can be enough to give it that hi-fi sound (which might sound good to play, but never works in a mix).
I got an Ashly 2-channel 7-band for the price of the 3-band Empress pedal. I run Out 1 -> In 2 to make it a 1-channel 14-band (10 fully parametric, 4 semi-parametric).
There's also the Source Audio EQ2. Pedal-size. 2-channel, 10 bands each. Gate, limiter. HPF/LPF & shelving options. It's digital, but it's very convenient to have 128 presets. It has to be connected to an app to access the parametric functionality, but once you save presets of your frequency and Q settings, you can adjust the gains from the pedal.
Parametric EQ is tone shaping with surgical precision. Graphic EQ is more like chopping at your tone with an axe.
Another great addition to the FX loop is the BBE Sonic Stomp, especially the new Pro version with the added 'Focus' (midrange) control. Tightens and sharpens the tone while keeping a thumpy low end. And the 'Focus' is a great mid-boost to make up for the mids cut with EQ. The EQ cuts and balances the mids, the Sonic Stomp brings that balanced midrange forward as a whole, while the 'Lo Contour' and 'Process' keep the highs & lows present and balanced with the mids.
 
I propose an alternative. The 5 band EQ is useful but it's a blunt instrument. It allows only some very coarse tone shaping.

I bypass the 5 band EQ in my Mark III and run a 31 band EQ in the effects loop instead.. It's such an incredibly precise and flexible tone shaping tool, once you get used to it and the tones you can craft with it, you'll never use anything else again.

I favor the Alesis DEQ series digital equalizers. DEQ-230 and DEQ-830D.
Hey @woodbutcher65 - thanks for your message - just saw it!!! I ended up finding one on Craigslist, and as chance would have it, I own an Alesis DEQ230D and will give that a whirl at some point sooner than later. Perhaps in a video specifically on 'looping' the slightly absurd number of EQ pedals/rack units I have managed to collect over the years (Alesis, Boogie, Boss, Empress, Furman, MXR, and Source Audio). Thanks again and have a GREAT weekend ~ Doug;)
 
Last edited:
I use 31-band graphic EQ in my bass amp FX loops, but I use a 10-band parametric EQ in my Mark V FX loop, along with the 5-band GEQ. Parametric is so much more versatile and is especially useful for high gain guitar, where the frequencies that need to be cut are very specific, and narrow bandwidth cuts are ideal. I can cut all the different wonky mid frequencies with narrow bandwidths to get a scooped-ish tone without actually gouging out all the mids. And I can cut the harsh overtones in distortion (~2160Hz) with very narrow bandwidths, so it doesn't darken the whole high end.
The fixed bandwidths of graphic EQ are too wide, and cutting just one mid frequency can be enough to give it that hi-fi sound (which might sound good to play, but never works in a mix).
I got an Ashly 2-channel 7-band for the price of the 3-band Empress pedal. I run Out 1 -> In 2 to make it a 1-channel 14-band (10 fully parametric, 4 semi-parametric).
There's also the Source Audio EQ2. Pedal-size. 2-channel, 10 bands each. Gate, limiter. HPF/LPF & shelving options. It's digital, but it's very convenient to have 128 presets. It has to be connected to an app to access the parametric functionality, but once you save presets of your frequency and Q settings, you can adjust the gains from the pedal.
Parametric EQ is tone shaping with surgical precision. Graphic EQ is more like chopping at your tone with an axe.
Another great addition to the FX loop is the BBE Sonic Stomp, especially the new Pro version with the added 'Focus' (midrange) control. Tightens and sharpens the tone while keeping a thumpy low end. And the 'Focus' is a great mid-boost to make up for the mids cut with EQ. The EQ cuts and balances the mids, the Sonic Stomp brings that balanced midrange forward as a whole, while the 'Lo Contour' and 'Process' keep the highs & lows present and balanced with the mids.
Hey @DECEMBER - sounds like you're more than a bit serious about all of this. Per your point, studio EQ, the most commonly used of all is of course parametric, and to your point of not being able to adjust the Q on a graphic EQ. I have the Source Audio pedal but did not realize it has gate functionality as well (duh). That makes it a great contender for high gain loop use. Thanks for the tips and insights - MUCH appreciated;)
 
Hey @DECEMBER - sounds like you're more than a bit serious about all of this. Per your point, studio EQ, the most commonly used of all is of course parametric, and to your point of not being able to adjust the Q on a graphic EQ. I have the Source Audio pedal but did not realize it has gate functionality as well (duh). That makes it a great contender for high gain loop use. Thanks for the tips and insights - MUCH appreciated;)
I have the SA EQ2, as well as a rackmount Ashly 10-band parametric. I prefer analog, but there are so many knobs in a 10-band parametric EQ (30) that it's virtually impossible to get the same sound twice. I've spent entire days dialing it in, trying to get it back to a sound I had before...
So I got the EQ2 for the preset capability. I was already using the Nemesis and Ventris with the Neuro Desktop app, so it was no problem to add another. The EQ2 is just a crude graphic EQ with really wide default Q, until you connect it to the app. Then it becomes fully parametric with HPF/LPF and shelving options, series/parallel signal flow, an adjustable gate, and a limiter, with 128 presets and MIDI recall/control.
I have extreme noise in my apartment that requires 3 gates to manage. One in front, the one in the EQ2 first in the loop, and one at the end of the loop.
After about 7 months with this amp, I finally have my EQ dialed in to a point that works for everything. It involves the built-in 5-band, one channel of the EQ2, and one 5-band channel of the Ashly parametric, plus the BBE Sonic Stomp Pro boosting the mids with the 'Focus' knob.
 
I have the SA EQ2, as well as a rackmount Ashly 10-band parametric. I prefer analog, but there are so many knobs in a 10-band parametric EQ (30) that it's virtually impossible to get the same sound twice. I've spent entire days dialing it in, trying to get it back to a sound I had before...
So I got the EQ2 for the preset capability. I was already using the Nemesis and Ventris with the Neuro Desktop app, so it was no problem to add another. The EQ2 is just a crude graphic EQ with really wide default Q, until you connect it to the app. Then it becomes fully parametric with HPF/LPF and shelving options, series/parallel signal flow, an adjustable gate, and a limiter, with 128 presets and MIDI recall/control.
I have extreme noise in my apartment that requires 3 gates to manage. One in front, the one in the EQ2 first in the loop, and one at the end of the loop.
After about 7 months with this amp, I finally have my EQ dialed in to a point that works for everything. It involves the built-in 5-band, one channel of the EQ2, and one 5-band channel of the Ashly parametric, plus the BBE Sonic Stomp Pro boosting the mids with the 'Focus' knob.
Hey @DECEMBER - THANKS for delving further. And yes, the Source Audio stuff is great. I had the BBE Sonic Maximizer back in the day, so you've sparked my curiosity about the Sonic Stomp Pro - thanks for that, especially the bit on the 'Focus' knob:)
 

Latest posts

Back
Top