Iconoclysm said:As the amp was in his store, it was still "in transit", as they hadn't sent it to you yet. As far as a contract goes, you'd never pull that off in a courtroom.
This is all semantics, mind you. If you took this to court, you'd win, because your product was "damaged in shipping". However, let's say the product was in great shape, and you knew they opened the box because they left you a note inside that said "HAHA, we opened this!"...you wouldn't stand a chance in court with your "contract".
Also, there is no "title", that only applies to cars and trucks. Business Law 101...I'm no lawyer myself (but my wife is), but it's obvious you're not either as this is actually Contract Law, Business Law applies to partnerships and corporations. If the amp was actually YOUR property, it wouldn't have shipped to the dealer, AT ALL. If the dealer chose to, they could have sold "your amp" to another customer and told you that yours is still on order. That amp, from the time it shipped from Mesa until the time the dealer shipped it to you was their own stock. Being an authorized dealer practically makes them a part of Mesa Boogie, I seriously doubt that Mesa Boogie would side with you simply on the principal of not opening the box. Delivering the best quality product is their goal, not shipping boxes with unbroken seals. The boxes we receive are not intended to be product boxes, just shipping boxes.
But as I said, you did the right thing, you should not have kept that amp.
I'm not a lawyer (my wife is a corporate Accountant and I am in Finance), so we are well versed on contract/business law for the state and region we operate in. And FYI....there is such a thing as title on items other than vehicles, houses, boats etc -- . It may be a virtual title (not a paper type), but it does exist. Title for the sake of this argument, is just another way of representing ownership it does not have to take a physical form (look it up, it's in your Business 101 book :mrgreen: ) When I placed my order with the shop, conditions were specified and agreed to - that created a contract (it was in writing in -- in the check-out area); he took the order, and agreed to it with those terms. Otherwise, other than calling me and sending a confirmation e-mail agreeing to this, he would not have processed the order . No he took it and said no problem (paraphrased of course). That right there, supersedes any of the stuff you reference above.
I clearly stated, the Dealer had ownership of the amp while it was in transit...as I had no "contract" with Mesa Boogie (they don't sell direct). The in-transit period for me began when the amp was handed off to UPS/FEDEX, etc en route to me; not when it left Boogie. When it left Boogie, it was the Store's order not mine. There was no contract between Boogie and me at this point. The contract between Boogie and me went into effect when the amp was shipped from the store to me -- in the form of my 5 year warranty. Anyway, we are going way off track now. And we can argue business law back and forth till the cows come home. Fact is, the amp was returned and I got my $$s back. And I will never again order a heavy high value item this way...especially when I have the option to buy locally. That is the lesson learned by me.
And, had the item arrived in new condition, I would not have returned it simply because the box was opened....why would I waste my time in court to argue a point just on the matter of principle? I don't have money to burn like that. Sheesh!