Wampler Triple Wreck into Mark V question

The Boogie Board

Help Support The Boogie Board:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

eudaimonia02912

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 11, 2010
Messages
581
Reaction score
0
I'd love to add a pseudo-Recto channel to the Mark V if I could. Do any of you have the Wampler Triple Wreck, and have you found it to work well in front of the Mark V?
 
Hey, I've got one and use it with my Mark V. I use it more for the fuzz effect than the triple rec. I'll try to record a few samples for you in the next few days. It's a great pedal. Try YouTube for samples, but I don't think any of those are through a Mark V.
 
I use one with my Recto Pre and actually prefer the tightness of it over the dist channel for most things.
 
I don't have the TripleWreck but I do have a Pinnacle. It works on the front end of my Mark V just fine. Generically speaking I haven't had any issues with pedals in front of my Mark V. Seems to like pedals just fine.
 
I'm not sure how "Recto" they sound, but the two best high pedals I know are these ones.

The Blackstar Dist-x
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOt85xh3rk8

and the new Emma Pisdiyauwat
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XscZPYKzXIQ
 
theroan said:
I'm not sure how "Recto" they sound, but the two best high pedals I know are these ones.

The Blackstar Dist-x
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOt85xh3rk8

and the new Emma Pisdiyauwat
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XscZPYKzXIQ

I had a Blackstar DistX for about 10 months. It sounded really good for a distortion pedal, but I tried it through the front end of my Mark V shortly after getting it, and it sounded weak and thin compared to the amp's distortion.
 
eudaimonia02912 said:
I'd love to add a pseudo-Recto channel to the Mark V if I could. Do any of you have the Wampler Triple Wreck, and have you found it to work well in front of the Mark V?
it works perfect in front the mark V!!! massive tone>>> it is my 4th channel in my mark V.
my looks like this
TW.jpg
 
Im thinking of picking up a Triple Wreck, apparently I feel like getting into more debt. They sound pretty cool in the clips Ive heard. They comes with a hefty price tag. Even used they command 200 bucks or more.

In your opnions... are they worth the almost $300 that they go for new?????? Can they be comparable to a certain type of amp / tone?
 
A friend of mine runs one through his Ht-5, sound huge to be honest, if you want recto on a budget its hard to beat, but, as stated above all my pedals (Including a pinnacle) have been rendered useless compared to the Mark V hi gain channels.
 
I ordered one today, and should have it in 2-3 days. If it works 75% as well as advertised, I'll be happy.
 
I picked up a Suhr Riot because someone was selling one locally. It got insane hype on the internet.... for $200 bucks... I'd say its not really a bargain. That makes me wonder about the Wampler. Despite the hype.... how will it really sound to my ears??
 
salvatruco said:
eudaimonia02912 said:
I'd love to add a pseudo-Recto channel to the Mark V if I could. Do any of you have the Wampler Triple Wreck, and have you found it to work well in front of the Mark V?
it works perfect in front the mark V!!! massive tone>>> it is my 4th channel in my mark V.
my looks like this
TW.jpg


Neat housing. It certainly is a big pedal.

I just got mine in the mail and will get to play it later. Do you have any settings you recommend for the big Dual Rec tone?
 
Cool... I am very anxious to hear your opinion of it. How cool would that be to have a decent little stomp to put in front of a small practice amp for quick jams or grab and go to play at church.
 
I've had a little bit of time on it today, playing through my seven string rather than my main guitar. I have not had the chance to crank it up yet, though, so I don't feel like I know what it really sounds like. (I've noticed that distortion pedals have a tendency to sound pretty good at low volumes but get worse as volume increases, unlike tube amps.)

Caveats aside, my first impressions are very positive. The pedal is articulate, has massive low end, can get the DR sizzle if you want it (or it can be turned off), and is very versatile. So far, running it into fat mode on the clean channel, it really does seem to be like adding a (tightened up, rather than saggy) DR rhythm channel to the Mark V. I think this pedal will be a keeper, and it will allow me to dedicate channel 3 to a Petrucci tone while using this pedal for all out brutal tones.

As I mentioned earlier, I happened to have a Blackstar DistX when I bought the Mark V, though I've since gotten rid of it. I thought the DistX was the best distortion pedal I'd ever played, and that it was better than some high gain amp heads. However, it sounded anemic and thin run into the Mark V clean channel as compared to the Mark V's channel 3 gain. This pedal keeps right up with channel 3, in large part because it has huge amounts of bass.

Still, I am generally skeptical of distortion pedals, so while it seems really great right now, I won't know for sure until I give it more time.

Oh, PS: it can be used as a Muff-style fuzz pedal, and can get Marshall tones as well. I can even get it sounding more like a Mark than a Dual Rec. The crunch/cream, mid, vintage/modern, and boost controls change the character of the pedal pretty dramatically.
 
eudaimonia02912 said:
I've had a little bit of time on it today, playing through my seven string rather than my main guitar. I have not had the chance to crank it up yet, though, so I don't feel like I know what it really sounds like. (I've noticed that distortion pedals have a tendency to sound pretty good at low volumes but get worse as volume increases, unlike tube amps.)

Caveats aside, my first impressions are very positive. The pedal is articulate, has massive low end, can get the DR sizzle if you want it (or it can be turned off), and is very versatile. So far, running it into fat mode on the clean channel, it really does seem to be like adding a (tightened up, rather than saggy) DR rhythm channel to the Mark V. I think this pedal will be a keeper, and it will allow me to dedicate channel 3 to a Petrucci tone while using this pedal for all out brutal tones.

As I mentioned earlier, I happened to have a Blackstar DistX when I bought the Mark V, though I've since gotten rid of it. I thought the DistX was the best distortion pedal I'd ever played, and that it was better than some high gain amp heads. However, it sounded anemic and thin run into the Mark V clean channel as compared to the Mark V's channel 3 gain. This pedal keeps right up with channel 3, in large part because it has huge amounts of bass.

Still, I am generally skeptical of distortion pedals, so while it seems really great right now, I won't know for sure until I give it more time.

Oh, PS: it can be used as a Muff-style fuzz pedal, and can get Marshall tones as well. I can even get it sounding more like a Mark than a Dual Rec. The crunch/cream, mid, vintage/modern, and boost controls change the character of the pedal pretty dramatically.

What is the going rate for one of those? Who did you get it from?
 
eudaimonia02912 said:
salvatruco said:
eudaimonia02912 said:
I'd love to add a pseudo-Recto channel to the Mark V if I could. Do any of you have the Wampler Triple Wreck, and have you found it to work well in front of the Mark V?
it works perfect in front the mark V!!! massive tone>>> it is my 4th channel in my mark V.
my looks like this
TW.jpg


Neat housing. It certainly is a big pedal.

I just got mine in the mail and will get to play it later. Do you have any settings you recommend for the big Dual Rec tone?
sorry for the late reply!! i am not at home yet.......

sounds to me that you figured out the TW....from memory my settings are:

level : 1:00 o'clock, gain: 3:00 o'clock, treble: 1 to 2 o'clock, mids: 12o'clock and sometimes full, bass: 1:00o'clock

as you know , there are lots of options with this pedal..

have fun!!!!
 
salvatruco said:
sorry for the late reply!! i am not at home yet.......

sounds to me that you figured out the TW....from memory my settings are:

level : 1:00 o'clock, gain: 3:00 o'clock, treble: 1 to 2 o'clock, mids: 12o'clock and sometimes full, bass: 1:00o'clock

as you know , there are lots of options with this pedal..

have fun!!!!


Cool, thanks! You and I must have similar tonal tastes, because that is exactly what I settled on last night.
 
eudaimonia02912 said:
salvatruco said:
sorry for the late reply!! i am not at home yet.......

sounds to me that you figured out the TW....from memory my settings are:

level : 1:00 o'clock, gain: 3:00 o'clock, treble: 1 to 2 o'clock, mids: 12o'clock and sometimes full, bass: 1:00o'clock

as you know , there are lots of options with this pedal..

have fun!!!!


Cool, thanks! You and I must have similar tonal tastes, because that is exactly what I settled on last night.


cool brother!!!!!!! it is a versatile monster.....
 
Back
Top