Jackie
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2010
- Messages
- 812
- Reaction score
- 1
I decided to play mad scientist again and run my TriAxis into one half of the 2:90 and my Marshall JVM's "Poweramp In" simultaneously (and I was able to A/B the poweramps too).
So I set my 1960A cab to stereo and plugged everything in. I put the 2:90 in the left side of the cab, and Marshall into the right. Then I A/B'd both the poweramps and I liked both tones, they both had something different but none was better than the other.
The Mesa was Deeper, more low mids, cleaner sounding, looser lows (more resonant). Phonetically it would be a GROOOOOOHL sound.
The Marshall had a tighter low end, that midrange snarl that I like so much, it was a fair bit "filthier". Phonetically it would be a more "WRAAAAAAAANGH" sound.
I was all "holy **** this is awesome". Then I matched the volumes and I set both the TriAxis outputs to 6... and the sound was great and all, really full in the mids (the Marshalls mids and Mesa's low mids mixed perfectly like a puzzle), but my bottom end disappeared!!
Any clue as to what I did wrong???
So I set my 1960A cab to stereo and plugged everything in. I put the 2:90 in the left side of the cab, and Marshall into the right. Then I A/B'd both the poweramps and I liked both tones, they both had something different but none was better than the other.
The Mesa was Deeper, more low mids, cleaner sounding, looser lows (more resonant). Phonetically it would be a GROOOOOOHL sound.
The Marshall had a tighter low end, that midrange snarl that I like so much, it was a fair bit "filthier". Phonetically it would be a more "WRAAAAAAAANGH" sound.
I was all "holy **** this is awesome". Then I matched the volumes and I set both the TriAxis outputs to 6... and the sound was great and all, really full in the mids (the Marshalls mids and Mesa's low mids mixed perfectly like a puzzle), but my bottom end disappeared!!
Any clue as to what I did wrong???