Interesting dilemma. I own a TriAxis/2:90 combo, and I just realized that I only really use the Lead2's (I quite dislike the Lead1's on my post- '05 NAMM TriAxis). Therefore, that would imply that I should get a Mark IV, as it would get me closer to the tone I really want (either JP's tone in G3 Tokyo or Liquid Tension Experiment 2). The TriAxis is nice, but not exactly what I'm searching for.
So I guess the question is, RKII or MkIV? Cost isn't much of a concern, as I'm willing to be patient and save up to get the one I want. So which should I get?
I love SimulClass and JP's tone in LTE2. Therefore I should get a MkIV. However, I'm hesitant on buying it because the design is just so old. I have a sneaking suspicion that the year I buy one, the following NAMM they will release a new version or something. That would severely piss me off.
On the other hand, I love JP's RK tone. And the RKII is supposed to be even better. I also love the Lonestar cleans.
Ah, the dilemma! What to do? Not to mention, I could even keep the TriAxis if it really came down to it (though I think I'd rather have a MkIV than the TA).
So I guess the question is, RKII or MkIV? Cost isn't much of a concern, as I'm willing to be patient and save up to get the one I want. So which should I get?
I love SimulClass and JP's tone in LTE2. Therefore I should get a MkIV. However, I'm hesitant on buying it because the design is just so old. I have a sneaking suspicion that the year I buy one, the following NAMM they will release a new version or something. That would severely piss me off.
On the other hand, I love JP's RK tone. And the RKII is supposed to be even better. I also love the Lonestar cleans.
Ah, the dilemma! What to do? Not to mention, I could even keep the TriAxis if it really came down to it (though I think I'd rather have a MkIV than the TA).