Whoopysnorp
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2007
- Messages
- 505
- Reaction score
- 0
Though I've been running a rack setup with a Studio Preamp and a Simul 395 for a long time, this is my first 'official' Mark series purchase. I just got back from giving it a little volume down at the rehearsal space. Basically it's replacing the Simul 395 so I can stop carrying two output transformers and sets of tubes around with me in my rack when I only ever use one. Right now I'm just patching the Studio Pre into the effects return, but soon I plan to rig up a switching system where I can switch between the Studio Pre or the effects send of the III. That way I've got instant access to four useful channels, and five if I do the R2 mod! The Studio Pre has the best cleans, so I'll probably keep using it for that, plus it has a smoother lead tone than the III. With the III I can have maybe a pushed clean, whatever I get happening on R2, and of course the high-gain tone of death on the lead mode. That rack is looking pretty intimidating right now with two separate graphic EQs and all the knobs.
I did have one question--the amp came with a quartet of Mesa STR440s but I put a set of Svetlana EL34s that came out of a Marshall I used to have in the outer sockets. I think I'm liking the tone a little better that way, but I don't know what kind of current they're drawing (my bias probe is broken at the moment). Is it as critical with the class A pair to have them in Mesa's bias range as it is with the A/B pair?
I did have one question--the amp came with a quartet of Mesa STR440s but I put a set of Svetlana EL34s that came out of a Marshall I used to have in the outer sockets. I think I'm liking the tone a little better that way, but I don't know what kind of current they're drawing (my bias probe is broken at the moment). Is it as critical with the class A pair to have them in Mesa's bias range as it is with the A/B pair?