212Mavguy
Well-known member
Hi Mick,
Sorry about using the word "Argument." "Viewpoint" is more appropriate and less combative sounding. I don't wish to argue with anyone, either.
Of course Randall Smith put huge amounts of thought into each of his designs. He can not control manufacturing quality of modern tubes, although he can reject those new tubes not falling within tolerances. Tough for him to know ahead of time that some tubes from the current batches are prone to letting go, he is human like the rest of us.
We can agree that we have not seen posts of failure of vintage 5y3 in LSS.
IMHO It's still a better idea to use a vintage 5v4 than vintage 5y3 in LSS due to greater capacities of 5v4, however. The price for vintage 5y3 is prabably not less than vintage 5v4. Modern or vintage 5ar4 would be also a very workable solution, but more expensive. Peace.
Not here to argue with anybody.
Sorry about using the word "Argument." "Viewpoint" is more appropriate and less combative sounding. I don't wish to argue with anyone, either.
Of course Randall Smith put huge amounts of thought into each of his designs. He can not control manufacturing quality of modern tubes, although he can reject those new tubes not falling within tolerances. Tough for him to know ahead of time that some tubes from the current batches are prone to letting go, he is human like the rest of us.
We can agree that we have not seen posts of failure of vintage 5y3 in LSS.
IMHO It's still a better idea to use a vintage 5v4 than vintage 5y3 in LSS due to greater capacities of 5v4, however. The price for vintage 5y3 is prabably not less than vintage 5v4. Modern or vintage 5ar4 would be also a very workable solution, but more expensive. Peace.