I'd been JONES-ing for a Maverick for about 12 years and finally got around to getting one in September (it was a short head). The Lead channel has that poor man's Dumble vibe to it but the Rhythm channel is kinda boring, lacking the sparkle of a Fender blackface amp. When you look at the schematic it is easy to understand where the sparkle went: between the input jack and the grid of the initial preamp tube there is a 1M5 series resistor (instead of the 68k low/34k high values in the BF design) and that resistor is bypassed with an 180pf cap to cut the bass. The normal 1M grid load is there but it is bypassed with a 500pf cap to cut the highs. Small wonder that you don't get the rich tone of a blackface amp.
The Maverick Rhythm channel preamp is almost identical to the Subway Blues, with the addition of the Fat/Bright switch. When you look at the Subway Rocket you can see where Mesa came up with the 1M5/180pf RC network on the input; on the Subway Rocket it is used to isolate the signals being sent and returning from the extra gain stage used for the Lead channel. Same concept as the 3M3/10pf reverb splitter that Fender used on the BF Reverb amps. So I guess that Mesa wanted the Subway Blues to sound like the Clean channel of the Subway Rocket for one reason or another so they left that 1M5/180pf RC network on the input. And I guess they wanted the Rhythm channel of the Maverick to sound like both of those.
Rewiring the input to BF specs is very simple but it would increase the overall gain of the Rhythm channel. So why not just Blackface the whole Rhythm channel preamp? Well for starters, there is an extra gain stage in the Maverick that the BF preamps don't have so that must be dealt with- this is getting too complicated for me! :? And then it occurred to me: wire the 3rd stage exactly like the reverb recovery stage on the BF amps. So I inserted the 3M3/10pf reverb splitter between the 2nd gain stage and the 3rd even though the actual BF reverb circuit was not there. (I actually used a 2M2/15pf splitter as a compromise between Boogie and Fender.)
The Rhythm channel sounds great now, similar to the Rhythm channel on the Lone Star but with the added Fat/Bright switch. Plus it has its own dedicated tubes (V1 and V4) and doesn't have to share them with the Lead channel so you can voice each channel with different tubes.
There was one change I wanted to make to the Maverick Lead channel- the 1M grid load to the initial gain stage is bypassed with a .001uF cap. It was a simple matter to remove that cap and the Lead channel is much more touch responsive and gets a nice clean sound when you back off the volume control on your guitar. (IMO the stock Mav Lead channel just got kinda wimpy and blah when you backed off the guitar volume control.) I think it goes without saying that the Maverick Lead channel beats out the Lead channel on the Lone Star so I think I now have the best of both designs.
I will be drawing up all of the mods I did and will share them with whoever wants them.
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed are my own. I tried some tube rolling with the stock Maverick to improve the sound from what it was like when I bought it. V1-V4 = GT5751M/GT5751M/GT12AX7M/GT12AX7M (for stock and with mods.) With the mods it sounds good with GT12AX7M's for V1 and V4. Or some NOS 12AX7's if you have them.
Steve Ahola
P.S. One problem I had with the short head was that the reverb tank stuck out of the bottom of the cabinet. Some of my cabs have handles on the top and that would keep the reverb tank from floating freely. So I took one of the feet and the screw down to the local hardware store and found plumbing washers (for sprinkler valves) which had the same outside diameter as the feet. I got 12 of the washers along with 4 screws about 3/4" longer than the original screws. Although I haven't done this yet it would probably be a good idea to epoxy the 3 washers together that go under each foot.
The Maverick Rhythm channel preamp is almost identical to the Subway Blues, with the addition of the Fat/Bright switch. When you look at the Subway Rocket you can see where Mesa came up with the 1M5/180pf RC network on the input; on the Subway Rocket it is used to isolate the signals being sent and returning from the extra gain stage used for the Lead channel. Same concept as the 3M3/10pf reverb splitter that Fender used on the BF Reverb amps. So I guess that Mesa wanted the Subway Blues to sound like the Clean channel of the Subway Rocket for one reason or another so they left that 1M5/180pf RC network on the input. And I guess they wanted the Rhythm channel of the Maverick to sound like both of those.
Rewiring the input to BF specs is very simple but it would increase the overall gain of the Rhythm channel. So why not just Blackface the whole Rhythm channel preamp? Well for starters, there is an extra gain stage in the Maverick that the BF preamps don't have so that must be dealt with- this is getting too complicated for me! :? And then it occurred to me: wire the 3rd stage exactly like the reverb recovery stage on the BF amps. So I inserted the 3M3/10pf reverb splitter between the 2nd gain stage and the 3rd even though the actual BF reverb circuit was not there. (I actually used a 2M2/15pf splitter as a compromise between Boogie and Fender.)
The Rhythm channel sounds great now, similar to the Rhythm channel on the Lone Star but with the added Fat/Bright switch. Plus it has its own dedicated tubes (V1 and V4) and doesn't have to share them with the Lead channel so you can voice each channel with different tubes.
There was one change I wanted to make to the Maverick Lead channel- the 1M grid load to the initial gain stage is bypassed with a .001uF cap. It was a simple matter to remove that cap and the Lead channel is much more touch responsive and gets a nice clean sound when you back off the volume control on your guitar. (IMO the stock Mav Lead channel just got kinda wimpy and blah when you backed off the guitar volume control.) I think it goes without saying that the Maverick Lead channel beats out the Lead channel on the Lone Star so I think I now have the best of both designs.
I will be drawing up all of the mods I did and will share them with whoever wants them.
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed are my own. I tried some tube rolling with the stock Maverick to improve the sound from what it was like when I bought it. V1-V4 = GT5751M/GT5751M/GT12AX7M/GT12AX7M (for stock and with mods.) With the mods it sounds good with GT12AX7M's for V1 and V4. Or some NOS 12AX7's if you have them.
Steve Ahola
P.S. One problem I had with the short head was that the reverb tank stuck out of the bottom of the cabinet. Some of my cabs have handles on the top and that would keep the reverb tank from floating freely. So I took one of the feet and the screw down to the local hardware store and found plumbing washers (for sprinkler valves) which had the same outside diameter as the feet. I got 12 of the washers along with 4 screws about 3/4" longer than the original screws. Although I haven't done this yet it would probably be a good idea to epoxy the 3 washers together that go under each foot.