Mark IV v.s. Triple Rec clips inside

[shredding]

Hi,
Excuse my sloppy playing. Just doing 2 quick takes for the tone testing purposes. Signal: Jackson DKMG-->Mark IV (or Triple Rec)--->Peavy MS412-->audix I5---->Presonus firepod--->Sonar.
Audix I-5 was off center and 45 degrees off axis.

Both clips are quite mid-rangy. The mark IV's midrange's intended. (the 750's not all the way down for lead purpose). I wonder if the midrange "cab" tone is due to the cab I have.

Mark IV:
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/page_songInfo.cfm?bandID=316375&songID=6084257

Triple Rec:

http://www.soundclick.com/bands/page_songInfo.cfm?bandID=316375&songID=6017200

 

[scottm]

hey shredding,

cool clips... i liked the triple. just a quick question, do u use a triple 2 or 3 ch? i am look for triple 2 ch clips if anyone out there has any please post!!

i own a triple 3 channel - love it - but am very curious to how the 2 ch sounds in comparison.

many thanx...

 

[shredding]

Scottm,
That's a triple 3 channel. It has quite a bit of EQ on the triple rec recording and also it's not compressed.

 

[Maldeve]

Was on your soundclick page and I have to say , this song is awesome man! Could you post the equipment and settings you used on this?

http://soundclick.com/share?songid=6099200

 

[OverDriven]

My honest opinion is that the Recto sounds good and the Mark was set VERY badly. Way too scooped with way too much buzzy high end.