I just pulled the trigger on a Mark IV A.
I know lots of guys here swear by the B, and I seem to remember a lenghty discussion about the differences.
I just spent 30 minutes looking at the drawings for each version.
It looks like much of the differences are in the power supplies.
Here is a list of differences that I noted that might contribute to the differences in tone:
No Harmonics switch in the A version.
More Gain in the B version for the Lead channel.
Various slight changes in resistor values in the power amp.
So, here is my question:
What is the tonal difference between the A & B versions using the same tubes & speakers?
Is it that drastic that the B would be a hands-down better version?
It looks like much of the changes that make it a B, can be done to the A. Has anybody tried this?
Is it even worth it to try?
Ok, so I know it was more than 1 question. Whatcha gonna do.
I know lots of guys here swear by the B, and I seem to remember a lenghty discussion about the differences.
I just spent 30 minutes looking at the drawings for each version.
It looks like much of the differences are in the power supplies.
Here is a list of differences that I noted that might contribute to the differences in tone:
No Harmonics switch in the A version.
More Gain in the B version for the Lead channel.
Various slight changes in resistor values in the power amp.
So, here is my question:
What is the tonal difference between the A & B versions using the same tubes & speakers?
Is it that drastic that the B would be a hands-down better version?
It looks like much of the changes that make it a B, can be done to the A. Has anybody tried this?
Is it even worth it to try?
Ok, so I know it was more than 1 question. Whatcha gonna do.