Mark II vs. Mark III in live setting

The Boogie Board

Help Support The Boogie Board:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

guitarzan1143

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 27, 2009
Messages
147
Reaction score
0
Alright so I had a mark III, and i just could not cope with the eq differences needed on the rhythm/lead channel. one would sound amazing where the other just didnt soudn that great to me almost every time.

is a mark II like this? Whenever i playd out with the mark III i was always fumbling with the tone knob on the guitar and switching pickups so i didnt high-end spike the audience on the clean channel and pierce ears, i have never played a mark II, but i really miss the Mark tone, the tremoverb is just not doing it for me.
 
It's pretty much the same compromise between MkII and MKIII, so you need two of them :lol:
You can always wire the tone knob to work in certain positions, then you won't have to dial the tone knob more than once each night.
 
tony777 said:
It's pretty much the same compromise between MkII and MKIII, so you need two of them :lol:

8)

That's what I'm after myself. If it's not too much for someone, it's a good idea.

All the Best,
~Nep~
 
Back
Top