I was reading the manual last night and noticed this under the Master volume's description:
"SECOND: They act as Effect Send controls for each Mode in the Effects Loop. As with many of the controls on the F-Series, the best results for balance and tone are usually found in the medium range of this control."
Why did they do that? Can someone explain that in English? Medium range so the Master should be around midnight? That will kill your ears...LOL!
"For the best results...Set the mix of your effect to 100% wet. Then dial in the amount of effect that you wish to hear, starting at 10% with the FX LOOP MIX control. The drier (closer to 10%) signal you use, the better your tone should be. This parallel type FX Loop allows the amplifier to retain its purity with the smallest amount of degradation due to possible effect impedance mismatching."
I've always ran the FX loop wet at the max 90%. What about you guys?
I'm also going to experiment this weekend (2 gigs) with not attenuating as much, dropping the masters a bit and hitting it with a boost or low-gain pedal like my Barber LTD to help cook the tubes a bit to reach decent distortion levels. I'm finding that pulling back the volume in the FX loop with an MXR EQ pedal is just crushing the dynamics of my clean channel. Add gain/volume to achieve tone, rather than subtracting from it. My new thought for the day It may totally bomb. I'll have to see.
"SECOND: They act as Effect Send controls for each Mode in the Effects Loop. As with many of the controls on the F-Series, the best results for balance and tone are usually found in the medium range of this control."
Why did they do that? Can someone explain that in English? Medium range so the Master should be around midnight? That will kill your ears...LOL!
"For the best results...Set the mix of your effect to 100% wet. Then dial in the amount of effect that you wish to hear, starting at 10% with the FX LOOP MIX control. The drier (closer to 10%) signal you use, the better your tone should be. This parallel type FX Loop allows the amplifier to retain its purity with the smallest amount of degradation due to possible effect impedance mismatching."
I've always ran the FX loop wet at the max 90%. What about you guys?
I'm also going to experiment this weekend (2 gigs) with not attenuating as much, dropping the masters a bit and hitting it with a boost or low-gain pedal like my Barber LTD to help cook the tubes a bit to reach decent distortion levels. I'm finding that pulling back the volume in the FX loop with an MXR EQ pedal is just crushing the dynamics of my clean channel. Add gain/volume to achieve tone, rather than subtracting from it. My new thought for the day It may totally bomb. I'll have to see.