Debating a Nomad 100, tone questions

The Boogie Board

Help Support The Boogie Board:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
Apr 26, 2011
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I have found a few good deals on Nomad 100 heads and combo's around my area, and seeing as how I am currently looking for a new amplifier, these are very tempting.

They appear to be very versatile amps, 3 channels, graphic EQ, independent reverb for each channel and a few other nice features. Reading around forums though, I have heard that these amps are very temperamental when it comes to the 'sweet spot' settings. While I do not mind this, i was wondering how true this was?

Also, I play a range of styles from Jazz, progressive, and Metal (Ill occasionally play some Moonspell, that's as heavy as it gets) Will the Nomad 100 be able to handle such a wide range of styles?

Are there any reliability issues associated with these amps?
 
I've had my Nomad 100 1-12 combo for about 5 years.

The amp is very versatile. Can easily do the styles you mention. They are a little temperamental when it comes to the 'sweet spot', as one little turn can really change the sound. This is a good thing if you're cool with knob twisting (though it can be a nightmare if you're used to 6 knob Marshall's that are easy to get one sound out of, but are not that versatile).

The only problem I've had with my Nomad was an issue they all had their first year of two of procuction. The knobs weren't deep enough to fit on the pots. A good bump of any of the front panel knobs would compromise that pot, leading to tone/volume fluctuations. Mesa knew about this and would send out free washers to place behing the knobs (though if the pot were damaged, it would either have to be re-crimped or replaced).

If the price is right, a Nomad 100 has to be on of the great sleeper amps out there. Not much of a fan of the 45/55 watt models, as the Nomad really needs that graphic eq and its ability to scoop out some of the mids, as it's a VERY mid heavy amp.
 
I traded an F-50 for a Nomad 100 about a few months ago, I have been really happy with it.

Like Nomad100 said, it's takes some tweaking (the manual is a great help) but there are a lot of great tones in there.

It also works very well as a loud clean platform for pedals.
 
The problem I've had with Nomads is that they ARE a very mid-heavy amp as mentioned above -- and their mid range is very nasal and ugly to me. The graphic will take it out, but will reduce your mids more than most players like just to get rid of the nasal honk. And cutting the mids this far hampers your ability to "cut through" a loud band without going to ear splitting volumes.
 
The Nomad 100 is great head for the price, I owned one before switching to a Bogner Uberschall then to my current Electra Dyne. It is a very "tweaky" like most Mesas, but even more so to an extent, but you can get a vast variety of tones out of it. Plus, I found that it had a great, warm, clean channel. Like everyone has said, use the graphic eq to take out it's natural nasally sounding tone, also I did the cap mod on channels 2 and 3 and that helped reduce a lot of the mud in the low end. Overall it's a great under rated head.
 
I missed out on the head, but found an awesome deal on a Nomad 100 combo. I picked it up a few weeks ago and have been messing with it sense.

After swapping the pre-amp tubes with GT 12ax7's I got to tuning. First off, yes, this amp is extremely bass and mid heavy. The mids are easy to take care of with the graphic EQ, but the bass is another animal. I have found that to get any clarity out of the low end, I have to completely drop the 60hz out of the mix with the graphic EQ, this gives some clarity while still allowing the amp to have punch. There are so many different tones in this amp it's giving me head spin, this being the first really high end amp I have owned, I did not expect so much versatility.


I am thinking about doing the cap mod, did it really make as big a difference as some claim? and how difficult is it to do?
 
Some of my experience with the Nomad.

Yes, it is mid-heavy. This can work for or against you, depending on the situation. Alone, the mids can be kinda harsh, in a band setting, all the mids do really help with cutting through the mix. I was able to hold my own against a deep snare drum that had the most delicious upper-mid *Crack!* to its attack, and a Marshall JCM2000 TSL with dimed mids, through a 4x12 with Vintage 30s. I did so with the mid knob turned only halfway up and a scoop dialed into the graphic EQ.

Channel 1 is a circuit similar to the preamp you might find in a blackface or silverface Fender Reverb amp. Granted, a similar circuit does not a Fender make, so if you want Fender cleans, get a Fender. That said, the Channel 1 Clean is a very good clean. Good for pedals, or good for just a straight up clean tone, as warm or bright as you want to dial it.

Channel 1 Pushed is a very fun mode. A couple resistors and caps are moved around in the circuit and it can now be overdriven, depending on how high you set the gain. Pushed can go from a cleanish edge of breakup all the way to a nice medium to medium-high gain crunch. The tone controls are pre-distortion in this mode, and can really shape the tones you're getting.

Channels 2 and 3 share the same portion of the preamp circuit. The circuit is similar to what you might find in a hot-rodded JCM800 2203 preamp, or in a one-wire-mod JMP 1959: three cascaded gain stages and a cathode follower driven tone stack. A few capacitors and differently tuned tone stacks are all that really separate the two channels.

Channel 3 sounds kinda British to me. In my band, I was getting similar tones to my other guitarist's Marshall, but fatter and a little deeper, especially with the scoop dialed in on the graphic EQ. It it tight and fast. I mainly used it for my main distorted rhythms. I never used it for metal, but I suppose it can be used for metal, depending how much gain you need/want. Despite channel 3 being the brightest and tightest of the channels, it won't get up to Recto levels of gain without starting to feel kinda mushy in the bass. If you want that much gain you'll want some kind of pedal to boost with, or another amp.

Channel 2 is voiced with much more low mids and bass than channel 3. So if you like channel 3 (as I did) channel 2 will probably feel bloated and clumsy. If you like channel 2, channel 3 will probably sound thin and harsh. I never found a use for channel 2 that I fully liked. I tried using it for edge of breakup sounds, but it sounded too dark to me for those not-quite-clean tones. I tried using it for high gain leads, and the smoothness of the channel does make for a nice contrast against channel 3, but I kept coming back to channel 3.

An aside, Vintage mode in both channels 2 and 3 only switches in a resistor into the signal path after the tone stack to darken the channel and quiet it down a bit. It does nothing to change the actual voicing or gain structure of the channel otherwise. You might find such useful, but I found it too subtle to be of much use.

The reverb uses a solid-state circuit, so it isn't that big tube driven reverb one would find in a Fender. It still sounds just fine, at least on channel 1. On channels 2 and 3, it is very subtle.

That's all I got for now, I'll post more later.
 
Back
Top