gitapik said:
Them's fightin' words, pardner...
;-)
No offense taken.
On the other hand: the current mod to the IIB isn't supposed to make it into a C+ and there's a lot more to it than the gain ( I mentioned it in my first post on here). And the idea that the C+ is that much better than a IIB is debatable. They're two different animals. My main reason for getting the mod would be the change in placement of the reverb relay.
Good thing, I wasn't in the mood anyway, hockey season is over for me ;-)
Yes I know there is more to the mod than gain. The effects loop is fixed, and the reverb is fixed/ improved too.
Was trying to avoid any confusion and/ or it being implied that the mod makes a IIB into a IIC+ (which you have now clearly stated it doesn't).
There's (sadly) been many threads / discussions erroneously claiming various mods to various amps make them into a C+.
IIB's are great amps, a very good friend has one. He also has a IIA which he bought new in '79, and a Lonestar.
A few years ago he picked up a IIC+ that I bought in the area where he lives. He played it (obviously) before shipping it off and was so blown away by it that he wanted one. About 4 or 5 months ago he finally had the cash and started his search and found one.
He still has his IIB. I'm sure he'll be keeping it too. All his Mesa amps have been in Mikes hands at one time or another.
In any case you are correct there is more to the mod than just the lead channels gain.
When I make it out to see my friend again I want to do a direct comparison.
(Fwiw his IIB has been modded at Mesa too).