Mungo Zen
Well-known member
I read a lot of comments from users stating that II C+ or IV sounds better in the original then in the Mk V. I think it would be interesting for someone who had access to the various amps to create unbiased samples of each but not actually list which is which, and then see which are preferred.
Tone is incredibly subjective. Like many people here I do not have access to A/B the Mk V with its predecessors, more so, many people do not have a history of using the earlier Mark amps.
A Blind Taste Test would be interesting to see if people who have little or no experience with the various amps display a preference one way or the other. Veteran Mesa users might provide interesting results, likewise, those who are adamant that their older amp is better, what would they choose in a blind test.
Like I said I can't do too much to start this, but if there is any interest, I can record and host MP3's for this, but haven't access to the amps. If you live in Vancouver and have access to the amps, or have the amps and recording equipment but no where to host the files, let me know and we can get something together.
Tone is incredibly subjective. Like many people here I do not have access to A/B the Mk V with its predecessors, more so, many people do not have a history of using the earlier Mark amps.
A Blind Taste Test would be interesting to see if people who have little or no experience with the various amps display a preference one way or the other. Veteran Mesa users might provide interesting results, likewise, those who are adamant that their older amp is better, what would they choose in a blind test.
Like I said I can't do too much to start this, but if there is any interest, I can record and host MP3's for this, but haven't access to the amps. If you live in Vancouver and have access to the amps, or have the amps and recording equipment but no where to host the files, let me know and we can get something together.