If you haven't followed this thread (http://www.grailtone.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=73352), Apeman and Bandit2013 outline how a few preamp tubes changes can transform the big daddy Mark V into everything it was ever meant to be.
The original title of the thread wasn't particularly clear, so I thought it was worth calling out directly.
I've made this change: I put a Tung Sol 12AT7 in V4 and a JJ 12AT7 in V6. Total cost: $40 after tax.
I used to say that my Mark V was the best Mark I had, if I had the fx loop off. No longer. It's better than it's ever sounded before, with the fx loop engaged, on all three channels. My JP-2C has been collecting dust as I *prefer* the tones I'm getting from my V over it.
I've been using Fat mode on channel 1, Mark I mode on channel 2, and mostly IIC+ mode on channel 3. They all sound fantastic.
I've also been using extreme mode, which now sounds better than it's ever sounded on this or any other Mark V variant I've ever owned.
If you have a 90 Watt Mark V, I'd suggest trying this out. If you have a JP-2C or a bone fide IIC+ to compare to, I'd like to know how you think it stacks up.
The original title of the thread wasn't particularly clear, so I thought it was worth calling out directly.
I've made this change: I put a Tung Sol 12AT7 in V4 and a JJ 12AT7 in V6. Total cost: $40 after tax.
I used to say that my Mark V was the best Mark I had, if I had the fx loop off. No longer. It's better than it's ever sounded before, with the fx loop engaged, on all three channels. My JP-2C has been collecting dust as I *prefer* the tones I'm getting from my V over it.
I've been using Fat mode on channel 1, Mark I mode on channel 2, and mostly IIC+ mode on channel 3. They all sound fantastic.
I've also been using extreme mode, which now sounds better than it's ever sounded on this or any other Mark V variant I've ever owned.
If you have a 90 Watt Mark V, I'd suggest trying this out. If you have a JP-2C or a bone fide IIC+ to compare to, I'd like to know how you think it stacks up.