Search results

I hate to let this go so soon, but I need the funds for something else that's come up. http://rvrb.io/2017-mark-v-35-hea-ac0 Comes shipped in original Mesa box as well, with original packaging.

Interesting, thanks. I've got a brand new SPA sitting here I wanted to toss in anyway, so I'll give that a go. Thanks!

Hey all, Just got a V:35 head. I had the V:25 before as well, and now I've upgraded to the 35. Everything seems to be good with it, sounds pretty much identical. I'm curious though; has anyone noticed on theirs if the Fat is louder than the Crunch is, even if slightly? On the V:25, the reverse...

I know this is an ancient post, but holy crap, dude. This track is absolutely killer, and the guitars sound awesome!

I use the Extreme with the gain at about 11am, bass at 9-10am. It's an awesome setting, particularly on the V:25/35.

Over a year later, and I still just want a 25w Stiletto with Vox cleans. :lol: Specifically: Ch.1 Vox normal Ch.1 Vox Top Boost Ch.1 (maybe?) HiWatt clean Ch.2 Plexi Ch.2 JCM800 Ch.2 hotrodded 800 No reverb. Just effects loop.

None of them do, IMHO. This may sound goofy to some, but I like my ROV25 more than the bigger Recs. They're great amps, but the ROV has that sound I dig. I also like the Mini Marks. Perhaps I just dig EL84's, I dunno.

The 10w difference between the 25 and 35 is literally the difference between speaker efficiencies. I honestly have no idea why Mesa didn't do a two 6L6 50w version. If you need more volume, I'd recommend the Power Station, or a slave to a power amp of some sort.

It does sound really good. It just doesn't sound like a Marshall. It's definitely Recto.

Not to steer anyone away from Mesa, but if it's Marshall tone you're looking for, the Friedman Pink Taco (and presumably upcoming Friedman Runt) is likely what you want. I personally am waiting for the Runt, which apparently has the BE lead channel and a nice clean channel. It'll complete my...

The V:35 is great, sounds much like the V:25. However the size and weight of the head pretty much puts me off, and I'm glad I got and kept the 25. It's basically the same headshell as the old DC-5. I still think the size and weight of the 25 is a huge advantage. Had the 35 been a 50 with 6L6's...

My next amp needs to be British-ey, so it'll either be whatever the TA/RA replacement is, or quite possibly the rumored Friedman Runt.

I had that iPad too. :lol: and I agree with everything else. 10 watts is literally the difference between two speakers of differing efficiency. The solo boost, if it's that important to you, is easily solved. I prefer the smaller, lighter head. You know what I'm "pissed" about? That they've not...

What's going on is most definitely whining, with a heavy dosage of self-entitlement. You're not a "test market" for anything. Unless you work for Mesa, it's not of your business what their business plan is. You bought an amp because presumably it fit your needs. If it didn't, then no one else is...

Yeah, someone doesn't understand what the word "obsolete" means.

What I really wanted when I bought my ROV25 was a mini Mark. 6 months later, the V:25 shows up. I bought the V:25 in July. Now the V:35 shows up. I bought both amps because they made me happy when I bought them. They both continue to do so, despite other stuff coming out, and Mesa not clearing...

I covered what I was looking for in the original post. Higher headroom, perhaps.

It is a great addition. But these people buying an amp that came out a year ago, and apparently being happy with it, then being upset that Mesa (a for-profit business) has expanded the line with a new amp, is nuts. As for the price increase, they do it as necessary, not because they're greedy...

The amount of butt hurt and self-entitlement in this thread is **** funny.

Has anyone tried a Mercury Magnetics output transformer in their Mesa Mini yet? I'm curious if it'll help at higher volumes, and/or if it improves the tone overall.