Search results

Hi Edward, Thanks for both your replies. They've been really useful. The search for a MkIII is on ! Cheers, Mac

Thanks Edward, that's incredibly useful. It really sounds like a MkIII is the one for me as I want the headroom. The Simul-Class vs non-Simul-Class question isn't so much of an issue by the sounds of it so that's reassuring. If I ever get the chance to compare the two I will, but in the meantime...

I second that : it IS interesting, and mind-bending too.

Interesting replies. I like the look of the Nomad and you can pick up second-hand Nomad 1x12s on UK eBay for around £600.00, a lot cheaper than Mark series amps, but there seems to be reliability issues with them judging by Harmony Central reviews. The only amp that never let me down on a gig...

Thanks for advice. A few folks are suggesting the MkIV here. Is the clean much better than a MkIII or are they much the same ? (I haven't had the chance to try either.)

I had a Fender Hot Rod Deluxe with a fantastic clean channel, then a DC-3 with a fantastic lead channel. I don't want to lug two amps to a gig so which Boogie gets closest to that twangy Fender tone but still delivers the classic Boogie lead ?

Thanks for the info. A really clean channel with lots of headroom is important for me for snappy country style licks and funk, so maybe I shouldn't discount the non-Simul-Class amps. Hmmm...

Hi everyone, I'm looking for a Mark III combo here in the UK (why must Boogies be SO expensive here ?) and wanted people's opinions on Simul-class. Is it significantly better than a non-Simul-class amp, and what are the differences tonally ? Also, I saw another post which described the Mk III...