Recent content by Wyzard

99.9 percent sure it's a IIC. Great amps IMO.

With all my Mks and lord knows what else, I've still got my original ED 1x12 combo. It has been used as a combo all by itself, as the "dirty clean" amp in a multi-amp setup, as the centre in a W/D/W, as a slave-amp-and-cab, and sometimes even just purely as a speaker cab (it sounds really good...

Not recognising your characterization of constantly fighting with "old ones" such as my MkIIs, MkIIB Coli, MkIIC+, MkIVB etc - all of which I've used regularly for decades. Nonetheless, and not downplaying your experience: everyone's mileage will probably vary.

Ever late to the party....... I've got a MkIIA HGX (written XPHG on the chassis side) s/n 524*, dated 5/28/80, and with the SP6A board. It looks like it's never had the Fetron switch installed, despite having the TR1009/12AX7 switching info panel stuck on the inside of the combo shell.

I've always said I love it, maybe even more than my IIC+, but I'm in curious about my Coli - to the extent of what it qualifies as: modded IIB, IIC or .....what? Not to mention, what the factory may have done to it (subsequent to its manufacture), and on whose behalf. Naturally I'm wondering...

I'm going to politely disagree with some of this. From a "gain" perspective, yes - a number of the newer boxes will out-smush my various IIAs, Coli IIB and IIC+. Not one of the post-MkIVs sound/feel remotely as good IME, however, at the somewhat lower gain levels I use all the time; and least of...

I will be, as soon as I can get it to my tech and checked out/serviced. PM me if you like...

Not round here it doesn't: using it is an invitation to a banging of heads. Hence my concern.

"Blue stripe is the best or green. Purple stripe isn't worth owning". An ...ah, interesting viewpoint.

It's a MkIIA. However..... the loop mod done by MB is valuable to some people (folk like me, for example), and as a result the lack of reverb can be a non-issue in terms of setting the value.

Ah, well that would explain it - the Celestion I was talking about (Black Shadow) is a circa 90W speaker - and I was under the impression when he said "Celestion Black Shadow" that it was a Celestion Black Shadow..... And "pal"........?

Er, no....... I've thrashed both of mine separately with amps closer to 100w output, and I haven't managed to blow either of them up yet: it's a 90w speaker afaik. It came as standard in some MkIVs, and pretty much every ED 1x12 too IIRC (my MkIV and ED both had them in).

Got to love Steve Kimock's thoughts on the subject with the C+, this being a continuation of DW's pushing for ever-higher gain, all the way back to the transition from IIA to IIB: "Ok, if I had shown my hand up front on this one I would have guessed set-neck, dual humbucking, and...

I enjoy the variety of the "+" signs: I think I like the "upside-down" ones best..... They sound pretty good too! As a further aside, and speaking as a non-high-gain user, IME the MkV doesn't do it.

I'm using Celestion Black Shadows on most things at the moment, so I guess the MC-90 gets my vote. I use both of the ones I have for the Coli IIB, or split them into one each for the IIA and/or MkIV. I run them with Two Rocks as well. Meanwhile my EVs, Creamback 75, Fane Crescendo etc are...