LEVEL4
Well-known member
Does the Mark IV do metal? You bet your *** it does! (no pedals necessary.)
Well, guys, I finally did it! I went to the Mesa/Boogie Hollywood store today and picked up my new Mark IV rackmount head! It was a bare head, originally housed in a Plexiglas display case (used as a marketing display), that they just decided to convert into a rackmount and ready it for sale. It's the LAST short-chassis Mark IV that I could find in the ENTIRE state of California (yes, I called EVERY dealer).
Here are my initial impressions [note: I don't care about cleans or blues-ey crunch, and my entire focus is on the amps' lead channels—my tonal preferences are metal and all its sub-genres]:
The high-gain lead channel was the first thing I tested. I was happily surprised by the huge amount of gain and presence available on the Mark IV. I've been demoing Mark IVs in stores for the past few weeks, and lemme tell you, it's a whole different story once you get the amp home, for some reason. I just got home and plugged it in, and I was grinning from ear-to-ear.
I bought this amp with a lot of trepidation, because it kept sounding a bit boxey and flat whenever I demoed one, especially when compared to the other Rectos in the store. Obviously, they're different amps, but I found them so different, that I ended up deciding to just buy both (and, glad I did). Also, I was concerned about overlap with my DC-3. Well, the Mark pwns the DC-3 in so many areas, that I'm not sure what to do with the DC-3 anymore (still gotta let this Mark IV honeymoon period recede a bit). Overall, I'm extremely pleased (that's actually a HUGE understatement) with the Mark IV, and also feel that it contrasts extremely well with my Recto Solo 50.
• The Mark IV pwns the DC-3 in the gain department. It has perhaps twice the gain on-tap than my DC-3 head.
• The Mark IV has perhaps, again, twice the presence and treble response over the DC-3.
• The Mark IV sounds great at low volumes, whereas my DC-3 needs to be cranked more.
• The Mark IV sounds much punchier and brighter through a 4x12 (even filled with just the cheap Celestions), compared with the Mark IV combo version, with its single, C-90 speaker.
• The Mark IV, when played through a 4x12, has a surprising amount of bottom, almost as much as my Recto, and, contrary to my initial impressions, produces very nice palm-mutes.
• Although the Mark can sound very bright to your ears, it still records very dark, even when using "bright" condensor mics.
• The Single-Recto Solo 50 still does that "scooped-Recto" sound like nothing else, and cannot be faithfully replicated with a Mark IV, IMO, especially when recorded.
• But, yes, the Mark IV is TOTALLY capable of "teh br00talz," WITHOUT using any pedals.
Recording test bed:
• DiMarzio Super Distortion humbucker in a 1990 HM Strat.
• Celestions (cheap, no-model number kind).
• Audio-Technica AT-3035 large-diaphragm condensor mic.
• Shure SM57 dynamic mic.
• PreSonus BlueTube dual-path mic preamps.
My Recto does that scooped, "Framus Cobra" sound quite well (at one-third the price!). The Mark IV does almost everything else. I still can't quite get that dark, gritty, Soldano SLO lead sound from the Mark. I believe the Mark is a bit too smooth and musical sounding for that, I think. I now plan on having my 6505 head modded by FJAmods. I may be able to replicate that sound after the mods with the 6505 (the only other amp I still crave is a Soldano SLO).
EDIT: Holy ****! I was so excited to play my new Mark IV, that I totally forgot to try my LP Studio with it! Playing my Strat, vs. playing my LP Studio on my DC-3 is the difference between "just okay" and "teh br00talz!" Can't wait to hear the difference on the Mark IV!
Well, guys, I finally did it! I went to the Mesa/Boogie Hollywood store today and picked up my new Mark IV rackmount head! It was a bare head, originally housed in a Plexiglas display case (used as a marketing display), that they just decided to convert into a rackmount and ready it for sale. It's the LAST short-chassis Mark IV that I could find in the ENTIRE state of California (yes, I called EVERY dealer).
Here are my initial impressions [note: I don't care about cleans or blues-ey crunch, and my entire focus is on the amps' lead channels—my tonal preferences are metal and all its sub-genres]:
The high-gain lead channel was the first thing I tested. I was happily surprised by the huge amount of gain and presence available on the Mark IV. I've been demoing Mark IVs in stores for the past few weeks, and lemme tell you, it's a whole different story once you get the amp home, for some reason. I just got home and plugged it in, and I was grinning from ear-to-ear.
I bought this amp with a lot of trepidation, because it kept sounding a bit boxey and flat whenever I demoed one, especially when compared to the other Rectos in the store. Obviously, they're different amps, but I found them so different, that I ended up deciding to just buy both (and, glad I did). Also, I was concerned about overlap with my DC-3. Well, the Mark pwns the DC-3 in so many areas, that I'm not sure what to do with the DC-3 anymore (still gotta let this Mark IV honeymoon period recede a bit). Overall, I'm extremely pleased (that's actually a HUGE understatement) with the Mark IV, and also feel that it contrasts extremely well with my Recto Solo 50.
• The Mark IV pwns the DC-3 in the gain department. It has perhaps twice the gain on-tap than my DC-3 head.
• The Mark IV has perhaps, again, twice the presence and treble response over the DC-3.
• The Mark IV sounds great at low volumes, whereas my DC-3 needs to be cranked more.
• The Mark IV sounds much punchier and brighter through a 4x12 (even filled with just the cheap Celestions), compared with the Mark IV combo version, with its single, C-90 speaker.
• The Mark IV, when played through a 4x12, has a surprising amount of bottom, almost as much as my Recto, and, contrary to my initial impressions, produces very nice palm-mutes.
• Although the Mark can sound very bright to your ears, it still records very dark, even when using "bright" condensor mics.
• The Single-Recto Solo 50 still does that "scooped-Recto" sound like nothing else, and cannot be faithfully replicated with a Mark IV, IMO, especially when recorded.
• But, yes, the Mark IV is TOTALLY capable of "teh br00talz," WITHOUT using any pedals.
Recording test bed:
• DiMarzio Super Distortion humbucker in a 1990 HM Strat.
• Celestions (cheap, no-model number kind).
• Audio-Technica AT-3035 large-diaphragm condensor mic.
• Shure SM57 dynamic mic.
• PreSonus BlueTube dual-path mic preamps.
My Recto does that scooped, "Framus Cobra" sound quite well (at one-third the price!). The Mark IV does almost everything else. I still can't quite get that dark, gritty, Soldano SLO lead sound from the Mark. I believe the Mark is a bit too smooth and musical sounding for that, I think. I now plan on having my 6505 head modded by FJAmods. I may be able to replicate that sound after the mods with the 6505 (the only other amp I still crave is a Soldano SLO).
EDIT: Holy ****! I was so excited to play my new Mark IV, that I totally forgot to try my LP Studio with it! Playing my Strat, vs. playing my LP Studio on my DC-3 is the difference between "just okay" and "teh br00talz!" Can't wait to hear the difference on the Mark IV!