I've found that I like the 5751 a bit more than the 12AT7 in V3, basically because of its slightly better dynamic feel. The gain rating (mu) on the 5751 is 70, while the 12AT7 is 60, so they're very close, in those terms. But as you drop gain, you diminish lively responsiveness, so it was a fine line between dropping a little and getting better clarity, and dropping more and losing the dynamic feel. I felt the 5751 gave me the clarity I liked, without losing the dynamics.
I'm well aware of Maarten's (a.k.a. TubeFreak) Triaxis tube essay. It was what originally inspired me to take on the retube task, several years ago. I have a lot of respect and appreciation for Maarten, and have actually sent him some tubes to try out. He does not have a Triaxis, though, so he hasn't tried out his theories on re-tubing it.
I differ from him on V5, because I've tried his suggestion for a low-mu valve there, and it ended up functionally raising the noise floor. So I went in another direction, trying out a 12BZ7 (same mu rating as 12AX7, 100, but twice the transconductance), and functionally dropped the noise floor a couple of dB. I also use the Hush Super C in the effects loop (the only device in there), and have no problems with this. So I'd recommend you stick with a 12AX7 in V5. Doesn't hurt to experiment, though, and I encourage you to do so - try a 12AT7 there, and see how you like it. Maybe if I used the Triaxis' record out, I'd reconsider (well, I do use it, for my tuner, but no problem there).
Oh yeah, regarding the Mesa warranty: I can only guess that they wouldn't want us bonehead guitarists plugging just anything into their preamps, and then whining to them if it causes problems. I think it is just their legal "out" for problems that are obviously user-error. But I've never discussed this with them, yet.
- T