HELP! Quad/triaxis or Studio pre?!?!?!!?!?!

The Boogie Board

Help Support The Boogie Board:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

jonnykingv

New member
Joined
Dec 8, 2011
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have been trying to get this sound perfect for 20 years! I want to cop the guitar sound from the whitesnake/whitesnake album (still of the night, bad boys, etc.). I recently found out that John sykes used a coliseum mark 3 on that album. Incredible guitar tracks. My question to the boogie pros out there is which one of the preamps is going to get me the closest. I've had 3 different rectos and that ain't it. Please help!!!!
And unless you have a mark 3 coliseum for sale, I don't wanna hear that's what I need!
 
I like John Sykes as well, the Blue murder **** rocks also
The Quad really nails the 80's metal tone to my ears.
Channel 1 Mark II can get you a real good thrash metal tone but i like it best for its great singing leads tone.
Channel 2 Mark III and the high gain rhythm tones and leads are great and likely closer to what your looking for. Put a quad with a old school 295 and a 4x12 or 2x12 closed back cab and you be in the neighborhood.
I imagine a loaded Mark III head through a 4x12 would put you there as well.
 
dbone said:
I like John Sykes as well, the Blue murder sh!t rocks also
The Quad really nails the 80's metal tone to my ears.
Channel 1 Mark II can get you a real good thrash metal tone but i like it best for its great singing leads tone.
Channel 2 Mark III and the high gain rhythm tones and leads are great and likely closer to what your looking for. Put a quad with a old school 295 and a 4x12 or 2x12 closed back cab and you be in the neighborhood.
I imagine a loaded Mark III head through a 4x12 would put you there as well.

What he ^ said.

As for Quad vs Tri vs Studio - I reckon it's a trilemma!

I have had a Studio (d@mn idi0t sold it!). I now have a Quad, Triaxis, C+ (1x12 combo) and DR (2ch), definitely forget the Recto for that sound it's certainly not-classic-Boogie. All the rest are definitely made of the stuff called Boogie.

Coupled with a 295 (or 2:90 if you have to) ... and you're there.

IMHO - it then comes down to what do you want to lug, how many channels, what do you want to tweak and what do you want to pay for?

LUGGING:
The Triaxis is only 1-ru but it's very deep and not trivial to lug. I only use a Nanoverb (can't be bothered with "big" rack based FX units .... which will totally drown out your valve tone) so it isn't too bad.
The Studio is 2-ru but about as easy to lug as the Tri because it isn't as deep or (IIRC heavy?). I remember it was okay to lug.
The Quad is a big beast. Drag an amp along and you need a gym subscription or multiple roadies.

CHANNELS:
But then again the Quad has 4 channels, plus or minus EQ so about 8 sounds. Monster.
The Studio "only" has 2 channels +/- EQ BUT I found that's all I ever needed after all, I always thought I needed 3 or 4 ch. but hey I was just dreaming.
Of course the Triaxis has loads of channels / programs but tweaking it is not for the faint of heart!

TWEAKING:
Of course the Studio is the easiest tweak, then the Quad and as already said the Triaxis is not for the faint hearted but then again it is the most versatile and rewarding (in the long run).

PRICE:
I think any of Studio, Quad or used Triaxis can be had a good prices. ATM the C+ and III are at insane prices so I'd skip those for now.
I paid $300 for my Studio - the price of a pedal!

Sorry this is cyclic logic, no clear winner: scissors, paper, rock ... but really the tie breaker is good old fashioned practice, practice, practice...

If it was me I'd just get the first one of the above I'd find at a good price in great condition and let that decide - but you might have a clean preference for lugging, channels, tweaking, price ...

Hope that helps,
A Ryder
 
A_Ryder's summary's pretty good.

I went for a Studio for various reasons. I wanted a small (six unit) rack setup with all of its flexibility but wanted to avoid MIDI - a whole can of worms I didn't wanna open. So that was the Triaxis out. I also couldn't really justify a Quad - while all of its options are 1/4" jack-switchable that would require a lot of switching relays which get very expensive very quickly. I find the two channels cover all the ground I need especially combined with a few floor pedals and a simple fx loop/ function switcher.
 
Howdy jonnykingv,

You definitely don't need a MKIII coliseum to get that tone. Get yourself a MKIII combo or Head and you'll be happy as a clam. MKIII = great clean, great lead and more portable than a rack setup.. unless there's some other reason you particularly need or want a rack mounted preamp and power-amp??

If its just a case of getting THAT sound then the MKIII is the one to get and any MKIII will do the job. You may want to read up about the different stripes/versions of the MkIII amp if you don't know about them already.



Shane
 
Back
Top