Other than the 100 watts and headroom, any difference in the sound/gain between a dual multi channel and a single solo. E.G. if 50 watts is enough, is the gain structure and tone more silmilar than not? If volume is not an issue (but cost is), is the sound of the dual worth the difference? Thanks.
dual vs. single solo sound
- Thread starter 58boogie
- Start date
Help Support The Boogie Board:
fluff191
Well-known member
Please do a search, duder. This topic has been covered in great quantity.
yes they are very similar but not exactly the same for a few reasons including the tube rectifier.
yes they are very similar but not exactly the same for a few reasons including the tube rectifier.
erectifier
Well-known member
for someone new to recto's the biggest difference is 3 channels vs 2 channels. imo this makes the dual rec a lot more versatile but i still love my single!
volatileNoise
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2009
- Messages
- 236
- Reaction score
- 0
erectifier said:
that and the fact the dual has a warmer "tube" style of tone (the rectifier tubes have nothing to do with this) than the single...
I remember when I traded my single in for a dual, and tried the same modern red channel settings, my heart sank. :lol:
And then a few days later I had the thing sussed... :twisted:
