Search results

thanks a lot JD! the changes you made to ch2 seems to minimally affect rhy2 and heavily the lead ch2. Are these for the modded C++ channel you were referring? or are they an improvement over the mark III circuit? Sorry to bother yet again, just wanted to understand the rationale behind the...

Thanks mate for confirmation. I'd like to change the ch1 to c+ spec as well! Are the ones in the photo you posted posted the only required changes? Thank you! Las question i promise 😂

Wow, thanks JD, you are a life saver! :) :) So the circuit is there :O I was under the impression that quad lead2 was having more of that bite/gnarl in the mids more similar to triaxis lead 2 yellow (iic+) and mark iic+ sounds (petrucci etc) more than lead1 and that puzzled me. I am now...

.

JD, schnarf are you both still online and reading this? I'd really like to discuss the effect of the missing circuit (resistor/cap series + parallel) at the end of the quad ch1 lead section. Is that critical for the IIc+ sound? I have both triaxis and quad, and the triaxis has it, and it has a...

2:Ninety has all the tubes running in pentode. check the schematic.

Hi guys, This is my first post and I wanted to resurrect this thread to share my findings on my personal quest for perfect tone. I have a TA + 2:90 myself and I could not get over : 1) the blanket effect 2) the dynamic voice which was not really what I needed So instead of buying me a new...