FedWar
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2020
- Messages
- 47
- Reaction score
- 23
Hi guys,
so I've always wondered why the first dual rectifier series (up to Rev G) was more mid-scooped than all of the later rectifiers, including the tremoverb, which is based on a rev G.
I've started to download and compare all of the available schematics, and started looking specifically in the tone stack area.
All of the later rectifier shows similar tone stack RC values in the filters, but there is a difference:
Up to Rev F and I think also up to rev G the schematics show a 1MOhm resistor between the red and the orange tone stack, labeled R215
So my understanding is that the signal would go through the active stack but some signal will flow to mass via the other tone stack as well.
Rev C schematic
Rev F schematic
This resistor or a circuit equivalent is not present in the Tremoverb
Nor in the Road King
Nor in the 3 channel rectifier
What do you guys think?
I am onto something or did I totally misread the schematics?
thanks to those who take some time to reply!
so I've always wondered why the first dual rectifier series (up to Rev G) was more mid-scooped than all of the later rectifiers, including the tremoverb, which is based on a rev G.
I've started to download and compare all of the available schematics, and started looking specifically in the tone stack area.
All of the later rectifier shows similar tone stack RC values in the filters, but there is a difference:
Up to Rev F and I think also up to rev G the schematics show a 1MOhm resistor between the red and the orange tone stack, labeled R215
So my understanding is that the signal would go through the active stack but some signal will flow to mass via the other tone stack as well.
Rev C schematic
Rev F schematic
This resistor or a circuit equivalent is not present in the Tremoverb
Nor in the Road King
Nor in the 3 channel rectifier
What do you guys think?
I am onto something or did I totally misread the schematics?
thanks to those who take some time to reply!